-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
Add Merge Account to NewExpensify #47073
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Current assignees @twisterdotcom and @zanyrenney are eligible for the NewFeature assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
|
Triggered auto assignment to Design team member for new feature review - @dannymcclain ( |
Edited by proposal-police: This proposal was edited at 2024-08-19 15:59:41 UTC. Need to improve this but startign with the P/S Proposal: add the remaining account settings to new dot, Part 1: Merge Account (Part 2: Device Management TBC)Problem:When users accidentally create personal accounts while their company is using Expensify, they face several issues. They must either:
Generally, users can’t share reports directly with their company in-app, and managing two accounts can be confusing. Users might also unknowingly create expenses that don't align with company policies. Solution:Rebuild the ability to "Merge Accounts" in NewExpensify. This feature allows users to easily merge their personal and company accounts on Expensify. This will improve the transfer from individual expense data to company-created accounts, giving visibility to admins and mitigating the need to create a novel account for those originally creating individual accounts. |
Pre-design on merging accounts for workspace feed/card conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C036QM0SLJK/p1723841346915409 |
Proposal: Add the remaining account settings to NewExpensify.Part 1: Merge Account Problem:When users accidentally create personal accounts while their company is using Expensify, they face several issues. They must either:
Generally, users can’t share reports directly with their company in-app, and managing two accounts can be confusing. Users might also unknowingly create expenses that don't align with company policies. Solution:Rebuild the ability to "Merge Accounts" in NewExpensify. This feature allows users to easily merge their personal and company accounts on Expensify. This will improve the transfer from individual expense data to company-created accounts, giving visibility to admins and mitigating the need to create a novel account for those originally creating individual accounts, and crucially, give them the ability to do take this action without requiring access to Expensify Classic. |
@zanyrenney Your proposal will be dismissed because you did not follow the proposal template. |
This is a bit mean, I haven't even done it yet 🥲 |
Not sure we need @dannymcclain here yet so will remove this from clogging up his K2. |
@twisterdotcom and I considered getting the pre-design out today or tomorrow but I realised we need to email strat@ prior, so done that and then can get the pre-design in flight! |
Back from some OOO. @zanyrenney has been predesigning in a canvas in my absence. |
pre-design is posted! https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C06ML6X0W9L/p1725276863731789 |
@zanyrenney Sure. |
We're working through a few PRs to cleanup the bugs we found in QA:
These all still need review and testing so they probably won't get merged until next week. |
Amazing effort @allroundexperts - thank you so much! For the LHN issue, i see that one is in progress, what kind of ETA are you thinking? |
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.1.31-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-04-30. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
The LHN issue is being handled by @arosiclair since it involved backend changes. We're waiting for @parasharrajat's review there. I raised the PR for #59764 and updated the status board! |
I will get this reviewed in 5-6 hours. Currently travelling. |
How did they reviews go @parasharrajat ? |
Facing build issues but it should be completed today. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Two issues left still:
|
One backend change is pending. |
DESIGN DOC ➡️
Proposal
Tasks
#whatsnext
[email protected]
and paste in the Proposal[email protected]
(continue the same email chain as before - your last message should be the WN Proposal) with the link to your Design Doc containing your high-level problem and solutionDesignDocReview
label to get the High-level overview of the problem and High-level of proposed solution section reviewedDesignDocReview
label to this issue[email protected]
one last time to let them know the Design Doc is moving into the implementation phase[email protected]
once everything has been implemented and do a Project Wrap-Up retrospective that provides:Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @arosiclairThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: