Skip to content

Merge account feature fixes - Part 1 #59911

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts commented Apr 9, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixes the following issues:
fixes #59767
fixes #59757
fixes #59759
fixes #59760
fixes #59761
fixes #59772
fixes #59784
fixes #59824

Fixed Issues

$ #47073
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Test 1

  1. Go to Settings > Security.
  2. Tap Merge account.
  3. Enter email of another account.
  4. Mark "I understand this is not reversible" checkbox.
  5. Click Next.
  6. Wait 30 seconds.
  7. Tap "Didn't receive a magic code?".
  8. Tap app back button.

Verify that the app will return to the previous page, which is merge account email page.

Test 2

  1. Go to Settings > Security
  2. Tap Merge account
  3. Enter long email
  4. Mark "I understand this is not reversible" checkbox
  5. Click Next

Verify that the long email will be wrapped into two lines and does not overflow

Test 3

  1. Go to Settings > Security
  2. Click on Merge account
  3. Refresh the page

Verify that the background stays in settings

Test 4

  1. Go to Settings > Security.
  2. Tap Merge account.
  3. Enter email of another account that has enabled 2FA.
  4. Mark "I understand this is not reversible" checkbox.
  5. Click Next.
  6. Enter magic code.
  7. Click "Learn more about merging accounts" link.

Verify that the "Learn more about merging accounts" link will open a valid help site.

Test 5

  1. Go to Settings > Security.
  2. Tap Merge account.
  3. Enter the same email as your current account.

Verify that you're shown an error and blocked from proceeding.

Test 6

  1. Go to Settings > Security.
  2. Tap Merge account.
  3. Enter any email that has a valid Expensify account.
  4. Enter incorrect OTP.

Verify that you're shown an invalid code error and it does not show the error code.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

Same as above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-04-09.at.10.08.38.PM.mov
iOS: Native
iOS.Native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS.Safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-04-09.at.9.50.50.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-04-09.at.9.51.14.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-04-09.at.9.51.57.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Desktop.mov

@allroundexperts allroundexperts marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2025 21:29
@allroundexperts allroundexperts requested a review from a team as a code owner April 9, 2025 21:29
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from lakchote April 9, 2025 21:30
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 9, 2025

@lakchote Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team April 9, 2025 21:30
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@allroundexperts Can you please use link this PR to the main issue as well via our template?

This way
image

@lakchote lakchote requested a review from parasharrajat April 10, 2025 08:03
@lakchote
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat could you please review it? Based on this comment from @allroundexperts.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Please add fixes before each issue in the list so that they get auto-closed afterwards, making it easy for all.

@arosiclair arosiclair requested review from arosiclair and removed request for lakchote April 15, 2025 16:18
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Apr 17, 2025

I couldn't get access to the internet last 2 days. I will test this asap.

Copy link
Contributor

@arosiclair arosiclair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM. Waiting on your review @parasharrajat

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Testing...

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor Author

WEB: #59757

image

@parasharrajat Fixed.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BUG: The Result page has the wrong animation, It should be right to left.

21.04.2025_08.14.18_REC.mp4

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor Author

BUG: The Result page has the wrong animation, It should be right to left.

21.04.2025_08.14.18_REC.mp4

Let's solve this in a follow up as its not related to the fixes in this PR.

arosiclair
arosiclair previously approved these changes Apr 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@arosiclair arosiclair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but there are conflicts @allroundexperts

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Please resolve conflicts and I noticing that I am not seeing the private domain flow now. It takes to be purpose screen. Is something wrong from backend?

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor Author

allroundexperts commented Apr 21, 2025

Please resolve conflicts

Done.

I noticing that I am not seeing the private domain flow now. It takes to be purpose screen. Is something wrong from backend?

The private domain flow is disabled until #54912 is merged.

arosiclair
arosiclair previously approved these changes Apr 21, 2025
@arosiclair
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat you still need to fill out the checklist

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Lol, my bad. I confused this PR for a wrong issue. Completing the final checks.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Apr 21, 2025

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

21.04.2025_23.44.52_REC.mp4

🔲 iOS / Safari

21.04.2025_23.47.16_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

21.04.2025_23.35.03_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

21.04.2025_08.10.02_REC.mp4

image

🔲 Android / Chrome

21.04.2025_23.29.24_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / native

21.04.2025_23.27.56_REC.mp4

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from arosiclair April 21, 2025 18:19
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Please check this comment before merging #59911 (comment).

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please check this comment before merging #59911 (comment).

Done @parasharrajat

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor Author

Waiting on you @arosiclair 😄

@arosiclair arosiclair merged commit 32c95be into Expensify:main Apr 22, 2025
17 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.1.32-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.1.32-8 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment