Skip to content

[FIXED] Stream peers drift after server peer-remove #6720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2025

Conversation

MauriceVanVeen
Copy link
Member

If a server is peer-removed, a new peer will be selected if the server hosted a stream. That new peer would be given the new peer set by the meta layer, but would then reset back to the old peer set as part of the stream's log.

This is a short-term fix, proposing the new peer set through the stream's log to ensure all replicas agree on it.

Later we'll need to rework some parts to ensure the meta layer only 'suggests' new changes, but the proposing actually goes through the stream/consumer's log instead of meta's log.

Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Neil Twigg [email protected]

@MauriceVanVeen MauriceVanVeen requested a review from a team as a code owner March 24, 2025 17:00
Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Neil Twigg <[email protected]>
@MauriceVanVeen MauriceVanVeen force-pushed the maurice/server-remove-peers-drift branch from bde74b4 to 273bd5a Compare March 24, 2025 19:13
Copy link
Member

@neilalexander neilalexander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@neilalexander neilalexander merged commit fd422dd into main Mar 25, 2025
37 checks passed
@neilalexander neilalexander deleted the maurice/server-remove-peers-drift branch March 25, 2025 13:59
derekcollison added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2025
Related to #6720, but for
consumer peer sets.

Makes `processClusterCreateConsumer` more aligned with
`processClusterCreateStream` by also doing the call to
`createRaftGroup`, which proposes the peer change automatically.

Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen <[email protected]>
neilalexander added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
Includes the following (already cherry-picked) PRs:

- #6587
- #6607
- #6612
- #6609
- #6620
- #6668
- #6674
- #6647
- #6684
- #6691
- #6697
- #6705
- #6706
- #6704
- #6714
- #6720
- #6727
- #6730
- #6726
- #6732
- #6759
- #6753
- #6685
- #6769
- #6777
- #6785
- #6786
- #6778
- #6790
- #6791
- #6798
- #6794
- #6801

Signed-off-by: Neil Twigg <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Neil Twigg <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants