Skip to content

Add merge account feature to ND #56911

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 55 commits into from
Apr 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts commented Feb 16, 2025

Explanation of Change

Implements merge account feature for NewDot

Fixed Issues

$ #54443
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  1. Open Account Settings -> Security -> Merge accounts.
  2. Verify that various cases highlighted here work.

Successful Account Merge
Action To Take: Log into the test account and navigate to Security in the left-hand menu.
Verify: The Security page displays options:

  • Two-factor authentication
  • Merge accounts
  • Close account

Action To Take: Click on Merge accounts.
Verify:

  • A screen appears showing the target account email (e.g. [email protected]).
  • The input field for “Email or phone” is visible.
  • The checkbox "I understand this is not reversible" is present.

Action To Take: Enter a valid email into the input field.
Verify: No error message.

Action To Take: Check the "I understand this is not reversible" checkbox.
Action To Take: Click on the Next button.
Verify: The screen transitions to the Magic Code Input step.

Action To Take: Enter the magic code sent to [email protected].
Verify:

  • A message displays confirming that a magic code was sent to the correct email address.
  • The input field for the magic code is visible.

Action To Take: Input the correct 6-digit magic code.
Verify: The “Merge accounts” button can be tapped.

Action To Take: Click the Merge accounts button.
Verify: The screen transitions to the Accounts Merged Confirmation page.

Action To Take: Review the confirmation message.
Verify:

Action To Take: Click the Got it button.
Verify: User is redirected back to the Security page.


Account merge blocked due to trying to merge an account with SAML into a personal account
Prerequisite: Set up a new private domain with domain control and require SAML. Create a new domain member email to use for this test.

Action To Take: Sign into New Expensify with a public domain account.
Action To Take: Attempt to merge the SAML domain member account into the public domain account.
Action To Take: Check the “I understand this is not reversible” checkbox.
Action To Take: Tap the “Next” button
Verify: The “Can’t merge accounts” screen appears and explains why the action cannot be taken i.e. “because your domain admin has set it as your primary login”.


Account merge for users on domain with SAML enabled and required
Prerequisite: Set up a new private domain with domain control and require SAML. Create two new domain member emails to use for this test.

Action To Take: Sign into New Expensify with a SAML required domain controlled email account.
Action To Take: Attempt to merge a domain email account on that same domain into the SAML required account.
Action To Take: Check the “I understand this is not reversible” checkbox.
Action To Take: Tap the “Next” button
Verify: The “We’re working on it” screen appears and explains why the action cannot be taken.

Action To Take: Tap “Go to Expensify Classic”
Verify: We are brought to Expensify Classic and land in the “Settings > Account details” section.

Action To Take: Tap the “Got it” button in New Expensify
Verify: We are brought back to the “Security” screen.


Merge Failure: 2FA is enabled on the oldAccount
Prerequisite: Create two accounts. One with 2FA enabled and one without.

Action To Take: Sign into the account which does not have 2FA enabled.
Action To Take: Attempt to merge the account which does have 2FA enabled into the account that does not have 2FA enabled.
Verify: The screen to enter the magic code appears and a magic code is sent.

Action To Take: Enter the 6-digit magic code.
Verify: “Can’t merge accounts” screen appears. With a message to “disable 2FA for [email] and try again”.


Merge Failure: User is trying to merge an uncreated account
Prerequisite: Create one account with no domain control or 2FA.

Action To Take: Sign into the created validated account in NewDot.
Action To Take: Attempt to merge an account that does not yet exist into an account that does exist.
Verify: “Can’t merge accounts” screen appears. With a message: “[email] doesn’t have an Expensify account”.


Merge Failure: SmartScanner account
Prerequisite: Create one account with no domain control or 2FA.

Action To Take: Sign into the created validated account in NewDot.
Action To Take: Attempt to merge an account that is one of our SmartScan vendor domains.
Verify: “Can’t merge accounts” screen appears. With a message: “You can’t merge [email] into other accounts”.


Merge Failure: Invoiced Billing account
Prerequisite: Create one account with no domain control or 2FA. Create another account with a policy set up for invoiced billing.

Action To Take: Sign into the created validated account in NewDot.
Action To Take: Attempt to merge an account that has invoiced billing.
Verify: “Can’t merge accounts” screen appears. With a message: “You can’t merge [email] into other accounts because it’s the billing owner of an invoiced account”.


  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

  1. Open Account Settings -> Security -> Merge accounts.
  2. Verify that various cases highlighted here work.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-03-07.at.10.35.26.PM.mov
Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 10 36 10 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 10 37 37 PM
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-03-07.at.10.25.59.PM.mov
Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 10 27 36 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 10 28 59 PM
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-03-07.at.9.42.39.PM.mov
Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 10 18 11 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 10 19 13 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 10 22 32 PM
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-02-24.at.1.08.56.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-03-07.at.9.13.47.PM.mov
Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 14 18 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 14 36 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 15 00 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 15 18 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 15 47 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 16 08 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 16 28 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 16 44 PM
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-02-24.at.12.49.16.PM.mov
Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 23 41 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 24 29 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 25 45 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 26 23 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 27 03 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 27 40 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 28 37 PM Screenshot 2025-03-07 at 9 29 06 PM

@allroundexperts allroundexperts changed the title Feat 47073 Add merge account feature to ND Feb 23, 2025
@allroundexperts allroundexperts marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2025 18:04
@allroundexperts allroundexperts requested review from a team as code owners February 23, 2025 18:04
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from parasharrajat and removed request for a team February 23, 2025 18:04
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 23, 2025

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Let us know when there are screenshots to review!

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Under review.

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let us know when there are screenshots to review!

@shawnborton Added recordings for web and desktop. I'm having trouble building on native devices, but these should help you get started.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looking good so far. Do you have an example of a successful account merge so we can see that flow?

Q for the @Expensify/design team - do we want to use our textSupporting color for the text below the heading here? I think we do?
CleanShot 2025-02-26 at 12 53 04@2x

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@zanyrenney Probably today. I will run it through final test round in sometime.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@allroundexperts Design of 2FA page is as follows. Can you please fix it?

Current Expected
image image

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BUG: Web: Android: Hardware back button and header back button does not lead to same page.

  1. On Error result page, press the hardware back button. It leads to validate code page.
  2. On the Error result page, press Header back button, it takes to enter email page.
04.04.2025_22.42.23_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Apr 4, 2025

I believe these are the only errors left here.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

02.04.2025_17.12.59_REC.mp4

🔲 iOS / Safari

04.04.2025_22.38.17_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

02.04.2025_17.03.13_REC.mp4
02.04.2025_17.06.33_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

02.04.2025_01.55.51_REC.mp4
02.04.2025_02.15.27_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / Chrome

04.04.2025_22.53.26_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / native

02.04.2025_02.18.39_REC.mp4
02.04.2025_02.27.28_REC.mp4

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

Copy link
Contributor

@arosiclair arosiclair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall this looks pretty good just a few suggestions and questions

Copy link
Contributor

@arosiclair arosiclair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the hard work @allroundexperts @parasharrajat 👍

@arosiclair arosiclair merged commit 53786aa into Expensify:main Apr 7, 2025
21 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 7, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.1.24-2 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@izarutskaya
Copy link

@allroundexperts QA found issue #59761

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.1.24-10 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.1.24-10 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants