Skip to content

Adjust copy for various report actions #60171

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 21, 2025

Conversation

nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor

@nyomanjyotisa nyomanjyotisa commented Apr 14, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #60035
PROPOSAL: #60035 (comment)

Tests

Same as QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

Test 1 (Submitting Expense):

  1. Go to Settings > Workspaces > Workflows
  2. Adjust the Submission frequency
  3. Create an expense on the workspace and wait for it to be submitted automatically
  4. Verify that the copy should read "submitted via delay submissions"
  5. Create an expense on the workspace and submit it manually
  6. Verify that the copy should read "submitted"

Test 2 (Approving Expense):

  1. Go to Settings > Workspaces > Rules
  2. Turn on the "Auto-approve compliant reports" option
  3. Create an expense on the workspace, submit and wait for it to be approved automatically
  4. Verify that the copy should read "approved via workspace rules"
  5. Turn off "Auto-approve compliant reports" or create an expense on another workspace and approve it manually
  6. Verify that the copy should read "approved"

Test 3 (Paying Expense):

  1. Go to Settings > Workspaces > Rules
  2. Turn on the "Auto-pay approved reports" option
  3. Create an expense on the workspace, submit, approve wait for it to be paid automatically
  4. Verify that the copy should read "paid with Expensify via workspace rules"
  5. Turn off "Auto-pay approved reports" or create an expense on another workspace and pay it manually
  6. Verify that the copy should read "paid with Expensify" and "paid elsewhere" if paid elsewhere

Test 4 (Exporting Expense):

  1. Go to Settings > Workspaces > More feature > Enable Accounting
  2. Connect to one of the accounting systems
  3. Go to Export > Export date > Change it to Submitted date
  4. Create an expense on the workspace, submit, approve it manually and wait for it to be exported automatically
  5. Verify that the copy should read "exported to %Accouting integration% via accounting settings and successfully created a record for [%type of expense% expenses]"
  6. Export it manually
  7. Verify that the copy should read "exported to %Accounting integration% and successfully created a record for [%type of expense% expenses](link to expenses in accounting integration)."
    Note: for both manual and automatic exports, if the report has both out of pocket and company card expenses, the system message will be:
    "exported to %Accounting integration% and successfully created a record for [out of pocket expenses](link to out of pocket expenses in accounting integration) and [company card expenses](link to company card expenses in accounting integration)."

Test 5 (Manual export to export file):

  1. Create an expense on a workspace
  2. Click on the expense header
  3. Click on "Download as CSV"
  4. Verify that the copy should read "exported to CSV"

Test 6 (Canceling Payment):

  1. Create an expense on a workspace and pay the expense
  2. Click on More > Cancel payment
  3. Verify that the copy should read "canceled the payment"
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Automatically Manually
image image
Automatically Submit Canceling Payment
image image
Android: mWeb Chrome
Automatically Manually
image image
Automatically Submit Canceling Payment
image image
iOS: Native
Automatically Manually
image image
Automatically Submit Canceling Payment
image image
iOS: mWeb Safari
Automatically Manually
image image
Automatically Submit Canceling Payment
image image
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Automatically Manually
image image
Automatically Submit Canceling Payment
image image
MacOS: Desktop
Automatically Manually
image image
Automatically Submit Canceling Payment
image image

@nyomanjyotisa nyomanjyotisa marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2025 03:29
@nyomanjyotisa nyomanjyotisa requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2025 03:29
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ahmedGaber93 and removed request for a team April 15, 2025 03:30
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 15, 2025

@ahmedGaber93 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahmedGaber93 I'm unable to test auto submit, payment, and export to accounting integration for company card expenses at the moment. But I think all the copy displays correctly

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've started a new Slack discussion here to confirm the translation

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

ahmedGaber93 commented Apr 21, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screenshot 2025-04-21 at 11 48 37 PM

Screenshot 2025-04-21 at 11 48 01 PM

Screenshot 2025-04-22 at 12 09 10 AM

Screenshot 2025-04-22 at 12 30 48 AM

Screenshot 2025-05-09 at 3 15 24 AM

MacOS: Desktop

@@ -1057,6 +1057,8 @@ const CONST = {
COMPANY_CARDS_CONNECT_CREDIT_CARDS_HELP_URL: 'https://help.expensify.com/new-expensify/hubs/connect-credit-cards/',
CUSTOM_REPORT_NAME_HELP_URL: 'https://help.expensify.com/articles/expensify-classic/spending-insights/Custom-Templates',
CONFIGURE_REIMBURSEMENT_SETTINGS_HELP_URL: 'https://help.expensify.com/articles/expensify-classic/workspaces/Configure-Reimbursement-Settings',
CONFIGURE_EXPENSE_REPORT_RULES_HELP_URL: 'https://help.expensify.com/articles/new-expensify/workspaces/Set-up-rules#configure-expense-report-rules',
SELECT_WORKFLOWS_HELP_URL: 'https://help.expensify.com/articles/new-expensify/workspaces/Set-up-workflows#select-workflows',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think DELAYED_SUBMISSION_HELP_URL will be unused after declaring this, let's remove it if it is unused.

@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ const translations = {
submitAmount: ({amount}: RequestAmountParams) => `Submit ${amount}`,
submittedAmount: ({formattedAmount, comment}: RequestedAmountMessageParams) => `submitted ${formattedAmount}${comment ? ` for ${comment}` : ''}`,
automaticallySubmittedAmount: ({formattedAmount}: RequestedAmountMessageParams) =>
`automatically submitted ${formattedAmount} via <a href="${CONST.DELAYED_SUBMISSION_HELP_URL}">delayed submission</a>`,
`submitted ${formattedAmount} via <a href="${CONST.SELECT_WORKFLOWS_HELP_URL}">delayed submissions</a>`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
`submitted ${formattedAmount} via <a href="${CONST.SELECT_WORKFLOWS_HELP_URL}">delayed submissions</a>`,
`submitted ${formattedAmount} via <a href="${CONST.SELECT_WORKFLOWS_HELP_URL}">delay submissions</a>`,

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screenshot 2025-04-21 at 3 40 35 AM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you also update the Spanish translation and the translation post on slack?

Comment on lines 1798 to 1803
if (!isPending) {
result.push({
text: translateLocal('report.actions.type.exportedToIntegration.automaticActionThree'),
url: '',
});
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the condition reimbursableUrls.length || nonReimbursableUrls.length may be accurate than !isPending, this will confirm that 'and successfully created a record for' will always follow by a link.

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR updated

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshots/Videos

Exporting to file

Before:
Screenshot 2025-04-21 at 11 49 12 PM

After:
Screenshot 2025-04-21 at 11 48 37 PM

automatically exporting to accounting integration

Before:

Screenshot 2025-04-21 at 11 49 05 PM

After:

Screenshot 2025-04-21 at 11 48 01 PM

automatically approved

Screenshot 2025-04-22 at 12 09 10 AM

automatically submitting

Screenshot 2025-04-22 at 12 30 48 AM

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

@nyomanjyotisa could you ask again for translation on slack and link the old post for details?

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure, I've bumped the discussion here
Could you help me tag someone from the internal team to forward it to the translation room? @ahmedGaber93

Copy link
Contributor

@ahmedGaber93 ahmedGaber93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! We just still need to confirm Spanish translation.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from Julesssss April 22, 2025 19:48
@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

Could you help me tag someone from the internal team to forward it to the translation room? @ahmedGaber93

Maybe @joekaufmanexpensify @Julesssss can help 🙏

reimburseableLink: 'View out-of-pocket expenses.',
nonReimbursableLink: 'View company card expenses.',
automaticActionThree: 'and successfully created a record for',
and: 'and',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets use 'and' from a different string. We can use or make a common string for this.

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe @joekaufmanexpensify @Julesssss can help 🙏

I have requests copy review internally here.

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR updated

Copy link
Contributor

@Julesssss Julesssss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for holding. I'll share the final translations below

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

  • submitted ${formattedAmount} via delay submissions
    • envió ${formattedAmount} mediante retrasar envíos
  • approved ${amount} via workspace rules
    • aprobó ${amount} mediante reglas del espacio de trabajo
  • paid ${amount} with Expensify via workspace rules
    • pagó ${amount} con Expensify via reglas del espacio de trabajo
  • exported to CSV
    • exportado a CSV
  • exported to
    • exportado a
  • exported to ${label} via
    • exportado a ${label} mediante
  • and successfully created a record for
    • y creó un registro con éxito para
  • out-of-pocket expenses
    • Exportar gastos por cuenta propia como
  • company card expenses.
    • gastos de la tarjeta de empresa.

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

The amount ($XX.XX) on approved and submitted translations has been removed in this PR
cc @Julesssss @ahmedGaber93

@joekaufmanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@nyomanjyotisa @Julesssss @ahmedGaber93 We had a discussion on the removing of the $xx.xx here. We want to proceed with doing that, but are reverting #59706 because it caused a different bug.

Could you guys just fold removing the $xx.xx from the report actions here? We want to remove it from any manual/automatic report actions related to submitting/approving/paying/unapproving/canceling payment.

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

Could you guys just fold removing the $xx.xx from the report actions here?

Yes, sure.

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed! @Julesssss

@Julesssss Julesssss merged commit 7abe4cd into Expensify:main May 21, 2025
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.1.48-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.1.48-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@nlemma
Copy link

nlemma commented May 22, 2025

@nyomanjyotisa Testers are not seeing amounts when submitting, approving and paying expenses. Is this expected?

Bug6839035_1747904315029.bandicam_2025-05-22_11-39-55-769.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.1.49-5 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

@nyomanjyotisa Testers are not seeing amounts when submitting, approving and paying expenses. Is this expected?

Thanks for raising, no that's not expected.

@nlemma
Copy link

nlemma commented May 22, 2025

The issue is not reproducible on prod. There was a similar occurrence over here and I wanted to make sure before creating a new ticket.

bandicam.2025-05-22.12-09-51-909.mp4

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

ahmedGaber93 commented May 22, 2025

@Julesssss this is expected, we remove amount from from some system actions. I am afk, give me 10 minutes and I will share the context.

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

Thnks. I'm just looking at the desired comments from @joekaufmanexpensify here, and I thought we still wanted the amount to show for submitting and approving, but not export.

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I was away from the keyboard. Here is the comment #60171 (comment)

Could you guys just fold removing the $xx.xx from the report actions here? We want to remove it from any manual/automatic report actions related to submitting/approving/paying/unapproving/canceling payment.

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

But it looks we missed updating the Test steps after the context changed.

@nyomanjyotisa Please update Test steps to include this change.

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

Ah I see. Thank you for sharing, I wasn't able to find that requirement 👍

francoisl added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
This reverts commit 7abe4cd, reversing
changes made to e9cdd22.
JS00001 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
[CP Staging] Revert #60171 "Adjust copy for various report actions"
francoisl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
[CP Staging] Revert #60171 "Adjust copy for various report actions"

(cherry picked from commit 60b83cd)

(cherry-picked to staging by francoisl)
@nyomanjyotisa nyomanjyotisa mentioned this pull request May 23, 2025
51 tasks
@Jdwang23
Copy link

Jdwang23 commented May 23, 2025

Hi,it seems like the action which submitted without amount is expected.But your upwork job is still here

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.1.50-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.1.51-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants