br: add restoreid to idmap table

[Tristan1900]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #61277

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Adding a restore id column to the restore idmap table to allow multiples restore happens and not stepping on each other's toe

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @Tristan1900. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[Tristan1900]

unused method so removed

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.7228%. Comparing base (32309b9) to head (e96b674).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #61278        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.1581%   74.7228%   +1.5646%     
================================================
  Files          1726       1726                
  Lines        478264     478380       +116     
================================================
+ Hits         349889     357459      +7570     
+ Misses       106905      98788      -8117     
- Partials      21470      22133       +663     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	46.2160% <41.6666%> (?)
unit	72.4416% <75.0000%> (+0.0243%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.7804% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	62.6370% <100.0000%> (+15.0566%)	⬆️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign benmeadowcroft, yujuncen for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS
• br/OWNERS
• pkg/session/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment