Skip to content

UPSTREAM: 76455: More flake fixes in HPA legacy tests #22591

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2019

Conversation

joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor

@joelsmith joelsmith commented Apr 17, 2019

See kubernetes/kubernetes#76455
This is the second half of the fixes from the upstream PR. Hopefully it will take care of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695326
(Here's the first half: #22531)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 17, 2019
@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

@RobertKrawitz PTAL. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@RobertKrawitz RobertKrawitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I notice around line 529 there's a somewhat funky construct where it sends to the processed channel before setting tc.finished. Could you take a look at that also? That looks like a potential race condition itself.

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's reading from the chan (and ignoring what it reads), not writing to it. So it's waiting for at least one event to come through on the chan before proceeding.

@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor

It's reading from the chan (and ignoring what it reads), not writing to it. So it's waiting for at least one event to come through on the chan before proceeding.

+1

@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 17, 2019
@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm cancel
The UT failure looks like it's unrelated, but please verify that.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 17, 2019
@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like the unit test was just an unrelated flake as suspected. And now we wait another 2 hours to see if we can get e2e-aws-serial to pass.
/retest

@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

UT flakes aren't at all good, but there's no apparent connection between what failed and the test that this fixes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 17, 2019
@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joelsmith, RobertKrawitz, sjenning

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 17, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 34ee3a8 into openshift:master Apr 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@joelsmith: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial 7383419 link /test e2e-aws-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants