Skip to content

[ISSUE #1328]🧪Add test for ConsumerData #1329

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 26, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1328

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced a new test module for validating the functionality of the ConsumerData struct.
    • Added unit tests for default values, equality, inequality, and hashing of ConsumerData instances.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new test module for the ConsumerData struct located in rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/consumer_data.rs. This module, which is conditionally compiled for testing, includes several unit tests that validate the default values, equality, inequality, and hashing behavior of the ConsumerData struct.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/consumer_data.rs Added a new test module with unit tests for ConsumerData, including tests for default values, equality, inequality, and hashing.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add test for ConsumerData (#1328)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
New tests for ConsumerData pop!
With defaults checked and hashes tight,
Our struct is ready, shining bright!
Hopping through tests, we leap and bound,
In the realm of code, joy is found! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 19.99%. Comparing base (5ee55bb) to head (3ce974f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1329      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   19.88%   19.99%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         434      434              
  Lines       54561    54638      +77     
==========================================
+ Hits        10848    10925      +77     
  Misses      43713    43713              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/consumer_data.rs (4)

65-77: Consider enhancing default value assertions

While the test covers all fields, consider adding more specific assertions:

  • Verify the specific variants of default enums (ConsumeType, MessageModel, ConsumeFromWhere)
  • Test the initial capacity of subscription_data_set
 #[test]
 fn consumer_data_default_values() {
     let consumer_data = ConsumerData::default();
     assert_eq!(consumer_data.group_name, CheetahString::new());
-    assert_eq!(consumer_data.consume_type, ConsumeType::default());
-    assert_eq!(consumer_data.message_model, MessageModel::default());
-    assert_eq!(
-        consumer_data.consume_from_where,
-        ConsumeFromWhere::default()
-    );
+    assert_eq!(consumer_data.consume_type, ConsumeType::ACTIVELY);  // Verify specific variant
+    assert_eq!(consumer_data.message_model, MessageModel::CLUSTERING);  // Verify specific variant
+    assert_eq!(consumer_data.consume_from_where, ConsumeFromWhere::LAST_OFFSET);  // Verify specific variant
     assert!(consumer_data.subscription_data_set.is_empty());
+    assert_eq!(consumer_data.subscription_data_set.capacity(), 0);  // Verify initial capacity
     assert!(!consumer_data.unit_mode);
 }

79-103: Consider testing more equality scenarios

The current test verifies basic equality, but consider adding tests for:

  • Multiple subscription data entries in different orders
  • Empty vs non-empty subscription sets
 #[test]
 fn consumer_data_equality() {
+    // Test with multiple subscription data in different orders
     let mut subscription_data_set1 = HashSet::new();
-    subscription_data_set.insert(SubscriptionData::default());
+    let mut sub1 = SubscriptionData::default();
+    sub1.topic = CheetahString::from("topic1");
+    let mut sub2 = SubscriptionData::default();
+    sub2.topic = CheetahString::from("topic2");
+    subscription_data_set1.insert(sub1.clone());
+    subscription_data_set1.insert(sub2.clone());
+
+    let mut subscription_data_set2 = HashSet::new();
+    subscription_data_set2.insert(sub2);
+    subscription_data_set2.insert(sub1);

     let consumer_data1 = ConsumerData {
         group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
         consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
         message_model: MessageModel::default(),
         consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
-        subscription_data_set: subscription_data_set.clone(),
+        subscription_data_set: subscription_data_set1,
         unit_mode: false,
     };

     let consumer_data2 = ConsumerData {
         group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
         consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
         message_model: MessageModel::default(),
         consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
-        subscription_data_set,
+        subscription_data_set: subscription_data_set2,
         unit_mode: false,
     };

     assert_eq!(consumer_data1, consumer_data2);
+
+    // Test equality with empty subscription sets
+    let consumer_data3 = ConsumerData {
+        group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
+        subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
+        ..Default::default()
+    };
+
+    let consumer_data4 = ConsumerData {
+        group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
+        subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
+        ..Default::default()
+    };
+
+    assert_eq!(consumer_data3, consumer_data4);
 }

128-152: Enhance hash consistency testing

While the test verifies basic hash consistency, consider adding:

  • Hash equality test for two equivalent instances
  • Hash inequality test for different instances
 #[test]
 fn consumer_data_hash() {
     use std::collections::hash_map::DefaultHasher;
     use std::hash::Hash;
     use std::hash::Hasher;

-    let consumer_data = ConsumerData {
+    let consumer_data1 = ConsumerData {
         group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
         consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
         message_model: MessageModel::default(),
         consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
         subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
         unit_mode: false,
     };

+    // Test hash consistency for same instance
     let mut hasher = DefaultHasher::new();
-    consumer_data.hash(&mut hasher);
+    consumer_data1.hash(&mut hasher);
     let hash1 = hasher.finish();

     let mut hasher = DefaultHasher::new();
-    consumer_data.hash(&mut hasher);
+    consumer_data1.hash(&mut hasher);
     let hash2 = hasher.finish();

     assert_eq!(hash1, hash2);
+
+    // Test hash equality for equivalent instances
+    let consumer_data2 = ConsumerData {
+        group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
+        consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
+        message_model: MessageModel::default(),
+        consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
+        subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
+        unit_mode: false,
+    };
+
+    let mut hasher = DefaultHasher::new();
+    consumer_data2.hash(&mut hasher);
+    let hash3 = hasher.finish();
+    assert_eq!(hash1, hash3);
+
+    // Test hash inequality for different instances
+    let consumer_data3 = ConsumerData {
+        group_name: CheetahString::from("group2"),
+        ..consumer_data1
+    };
+
+    let mut hasher = DefaultHasher::new();
+    consumer_data3.hash(&mut hasher);
+    let hash4 = hasher.finish();
+    assert_ne!(hash1, hash4);
 }

53-153: Overall implementation looks good with room for enhancement

The test implementation successfully covers the basic functionality of ConsumerData, satisfying the PR objectives. The tests are well-structured and follow Rust testing practices. Consider implementing the suggested enhancements in future iterations to achieve more comprehensive test coverage.

For future improvements, consider:

  1. Adding property-based tests using frameworks like proptest
  2. Testing edge cases with large subscription sets
  3. Adding integration tests with other components that use ConsumerData
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ee55bb and 3ce974f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/consumer_data.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/consumer_data.rs (1)

53-64: LGTM! Well-structured test module setup

The test module is properly configured with the correct test attribute and includes all necessary imports.

Comment on lines +105 to +126
#[test]
fn consumer_data_inequality() {
let consumer_data1 = ConsumerData {
group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
message_model: MessageModel::default(),
consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
unit_mode: false,
};

let consumer_data2 = ConsumerData {
group_name: CheetahString::from("group2"),
consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
message_model: MessageModel::default(),
consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
unit_mode: false,
};

assert_ne!(consumer_data1, consumer_data2);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Expand inequality test coverage

The test only verifies inequality for different group names. Consider testing inequality for:

  • Different consume_type values
  • Different message_model values
  • Different consume_from_where values
  • Different subscription_data_set contents
  • Different unit_mode values
 #[test]
 fn consumer_data_inequality() {
+    let base_consumer = ConsumerData {
+        group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
+        consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
+        message_model: MessageModel::default(),
+        consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
+        subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
+        unit_mode: false,
+    };
+
+    // Test inequality for each field
     let consumer_data1 = ConsumerData {
-        group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
-        consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
-        message_model: MessageModel::default(),
-        consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
-        subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
-        unit_mode: false,
+        group_name: CheetahString::from("group2"),
+        ..base_consumer.clone()
     };
+    assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data1);

     let consumer_data2 = ConsumerData {
-        group_name: CheetahString::from("group2"),
-        consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
-        message_model: MessageModel::default(),
-        consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
-        subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
-        unit_mode: false,
+        consume_type: ConsumeType::PASSIVELY,
+        ..base_consumer.clone()
     };
+    assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data2);

-    assert_ne!(consumer_data1, consumer_data2);
+    let consumer_data3 = ConsumerData {
+        message_model: MessageModel::BROADCASTING,
+        ..base_consumer.clone()
+    };
+    assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data3);
+
+    let mut subscription_set = HashSet::new();
+    let mut sub = SubscriptionData::default();
+    sub.topic = CheetahString::from("topic1");
+    subscription_set.insert(sub);
+    let consumer_data4 = ConsumerData {
+        subscription_data_set: subscription_set,
+        ..base_consumer.clone()
+    };
+    assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data4);
+
+    let consumer_data5 = ConsumerData {
+        unit_mode: true,
+        ..base_consumer
+    };
+    assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data5);
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
#[test]
fn consumer_data_inequality() {
let consumer_data1 = ConsumerData {
group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
message_model: MessageModel::default(),
consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
unit_mode: false,
};
let consumer_data2 = ConsumerData {
group_name: CheetahString::from("group2"),
consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
message_model: MessageModel::default(),
consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
unit_mode: false,
};
assert_ne!(consumer_data1, consumer_data2);
}
#[test]
fn consumer_data_inequality() {
let base_consumer = ConsumerData {
group_name: CheetahString::from("group1"),
consume_type: ConsumeType::default(),
message_model: MessageModel::default(),
consume_from_where: ConsumeFromWhere::default(),
subscription_data_set: HashSet::new(),
unit_mode: false,
};
// Test inequality for each field
let consumer_data1 = ConsumerData {
group_name: CheetahString::from("group2"),
..base_consumer.clone()
};
assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data1);
let consumer_data2 = ConsumerData {
consume_type: ConsumeType::PASSIVELY,
..base_consumer.clone()
};
assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data2);
let consumer_data3 = ConsumerData {
message_model: MessageModel::BROADCASTING,
..base_consumer.clone()
};
assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data3);
let mut subscription_set = HashSet::new();
let mut sub = SubscriptionData::default();
sub.topic = CheetahString::from("topic1");
subscription_set.insert(sub);
let consumer_data4 = ConsumerData {
subscription_data_set: subscription_set,
..base_consumer.clone()
};
assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data4);
let consumer_data5 = ConsumerData {
unit_mode: true,
..base_consumer
};
assert_ne!(base_consumer, consumer_data5);
}

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved auto merge and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 26, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 6284f3e into main Nov 26, 2024
30 checks passed
@mxsm mxsm deleted the test-1328 branch November 27, 2024 04:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Unit Test🧪] Add test for ConsumerData
4 participants