-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
[ISSUE #1338]🧪Add Unit test for ProducerData #1339
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new test module for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@what-design 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1339 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 19.99% 20.07% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 434 434
Lines 54638 54691 +53
==========================================
+ Hits 10925 10978 +53
Misses 43713 43713 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/producer_data.rs (1)
65-79
: Add edge cases for serialization tests.While the basic serialization/deserialization tests are good, consider adding tests for:
- Group names with special characters
- Empty group names
- Very long group names
- Invalid JSON handling
Here's a suggested implementation:
#[test] fn serialize_producer_data_edge_cases() { let cases = vec![ ("", r#"{"groupName":""}"#), ("group@#$%", r#"{"groupName":"group@#$%"}"#), ("a".repeat(1000), format!(r#"{{"groupName":"{}"}}"#, "a".repeat(1000))), ]; for (input, expected) in cases { let producer_data = ProducerData { group_name: CheetahString::from(input), }; let serialized = serde_json::to_string(&producer_data).unwrap(); assert_eq!(serialized, expected); } } #[test] fn deserialize_producer_data_invalid_json() { let invalid_jsons = vec![ r#"{"groupName":}"#, r#"{"wrongField":"group1"}"#, ]; for invalid_json in invalid_jsons { assert!(serde_json::from_str::<ProducerData>(invalid_json).is_err()); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/producer_data.rs
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/producer_data.rs (5)
33-37
: LGTM! Well-structured default value test.
The test properly verifies the default state of ProducerData.
39-63
: LGTM! Comprehensive equality testing.
The equality and inequality tests are well-implemented, covering both positive and negative cases.
81-100
: LGTM! Thorough hash consistency test.
The hash test properly verifies that the same ProducerData instance produces consistent hash values.
27-101
: Overall test implementation looks solid! 🎉
The test module provides good coverage of the ProducerData functionality, including:
- Default values
- Equality comparisons
- Serialization/deserialization
- Hash consistency
While the current implementation is solid, consider adding the suggested edge cases to make it even more robust.
Line range hint 21-25
: Verify the necessity of CheetahString
The struct is well-designed with appropriate trait derivations. However, let's verify if CheetahString
is the optimal choice here compared to the standard String
type.
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1338
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
ProducerData
struct.These enhancements improve the reliability and confidence in the
ProducerData
functionality.