Skip to content

[ISSUE #1188]🔨Upate Github actions CI🔧 #1189

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 17, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1188

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced pull request comment functionality to include the contributor's username, personalizing the acknowledgment message.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved interaction by ensuring contributors are directly addressed in comments.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml to enhance the comment functionality for pull requests. The key change is the dynamic inclusion of the pull request creator's username in the comment body, personalizing the message to acknowledge the contributor directly. The remaining workflow steps, including code checkout and label addition, remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml Modified to include the pull request creator's username in the comment body for personalized interaction.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Enhance GitHub Actions CI workflow (#1188)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

approved, auto merge

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where code does bloom,
A message now dances, dispelling the gloom.
"Thanks for your work," it cheerfully sings,
With usernames bright, oh the joy that it brings!
So hop along, dear coder, with glee,
For your contributions are cherished, you see! 🎉

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@mxsm has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6682299 and b0af926.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added AI review first Ai review pr first ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.68%. Comparing base (6682299) to head (b0af926).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1189   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   16.68%   16.68%           
=======================================
  Files         427      427           
  Lines       52836    52836           
=======================================
  Hits         8815     8815           
  Misses      44021    44021           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml (1)

22-25: Clean up unnecessary blank lines and trailing spaces

Remove trailing spaces and reduce consecutive blank lines to improve code formatting.

Apply this formatting fix:

            const { owner, repo, number: issue_number } = context.issue;
-            
-
            // Get PR creator's username
            const prCreator = context.payload.pull_request.user.login;
-            
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 22-22: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 25-25: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6682299 and b0af926.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml

[error] 22-22: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 25-25: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml (1)

Line range hint 17-35: Verify bot permissions and label existence

The workflow looks functionally correct, but please ensure:

  1. The BOT_TOKEN has necessary permissions for comment creation and label management
  2. All labels (ready to review, waiting-review, Ai ready to review) exist in the repository

Let's verify the label configuration:

✅ Verification successful

Labels are correctly configured in the repository

All required labels mentioned in the workflow are present in the repository:

  • ready to review (#63DEF3)
  • waiting-review (#6801F1)
  • Ai ready to review (#B9F53E)

Let's verify the bot token permissions:


Workflow configuration is correct and secure

The workflow is properly configured:

  1. All required labels exist in the repository and match the ones used in the workflow
  2. The workflow uses pull_request_target event which is appropriate for handling external PRs
  3. The BOT_TOKEN is used with github-script action which is a secure pattern for GitHub API operations
  4. The script performs only the documented operations (commenting and labeling)

No issues found with the implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the required labels exist in the repository

# Check if the required labels exist
gh label list | grep -E "ready to review|waiting-review|Ai ready to review"

Length of output: 200


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check workflow permissions and secrets configuration
cat .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml | grep -A 5 "permissions:"

Length of output: 68


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire workflow file to understand the permissions context
cat .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml

Length of output: 1149

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 22-22: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 25-25: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Comment on lines +23 to +26
// Get PR creator's username
const prCreator = context.payload.pull_request.user.login;

const commentBody = "🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉 @${prCreator}. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix template literal syntax for proper username interpolation

The current implementation won't properly interpolate the PR creator's username. The string needs to use backticks (`) instead of single quotes for template literal interpolation to work.

Apply this fix:

            // Get PR creator's username
            const prCreator = context.payload.pull_request.user.login;
            
-            const commentBody = "🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉 @${prCreator}. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥";
+            const commentBody = `🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉 @${prCreator}. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥`;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// Get PR creator's username
const prCreator = context.payload.pull_request.user.login;
const commentBody = "🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉 @${prCreator}. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥";
// Get PR creator's username
const prCreator = context.payload.pull_request.user.login;
const commentBody = `🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉 @${prCreator}. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥`;
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 25-25: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Upate Github actions CI
3 participants