Skip to content

[ISSUE #539]🔨Optimize Auto Comment on PR #540

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

[ISSUE #539]🔨Optimize Auto Comment on PR #540

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jun 14, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #539

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub token configuration for improved security.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 14, 2024

Walkthrough

This update modifies the GitHub Actions workflow by changing the authentication token used for commenting on pull requests. Specifically, the change swaps the GitHub token variable from ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} to a more personalized ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }} for more tailored access control.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml Updated GitHub token variable from ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} to ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }}

Poem

A bunny in the fields of code,
Shifts tokens like a gentle ode.
From GITHUB’s secrets to PAT’s embrace,
A safer trail, a wiser pace.
In the warren of workflows, secure and bright,
CodeRabbit leaps with pure delight! 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner Author

mxsm commented Jun 14, 2024

@coderabbitai review Please review this PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from SpaceXCN and TeslaRustor June 14, 2024 06:21
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 14, 2024

@mxsm, I have reviewed the changes in the .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml file. Here are the key points:

  1. Workflow Triggers: The workflow is correctly configured to trigger on pull requests when they are opened or synchronized, which is suitable for the intended use case of auto-commenting.

  2. GitHub Actions Usage: The use of actions/checkout@v4 for checking out the code and actions/github-script@v7 for running scripts is up-to-date and follows best practices.

  3. Script Functionality: The script effectively creates a comment to request a review upon each pull request event. This aligns with the objective of optimizing auto-comments on PRs.

  4. Security Practices: The use of PAT_TOKEN as a secret for GitHub token is secure, ensuring that the workflow has the necessary permissions to create comments without exposing the token in the code.

Overall, the modifications in this PR seem well-designed to enhance the auto-comment functionality on pull requests. If there are specific aspects of the workflow or its integration that you would like further reviewed or tested, please let me know!

Analysis chain
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all files changed in this PR
git diff --name-only HEAD^ HEAD

Length of output: 73



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Display the content of the modified GitHub Actions workflow file
cat .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml

Length of output: 714

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d726e0e and 18f3eb2.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.37%. Comparing base (d726e0e) to head (18f3eb2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #540   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   25.37%   25.37%           
=======================================
  Files         233      233           
  Lines       17014    17014           
=======================================
  Hits         4317     4317           
  Misses      12697    12697           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TeslaRustor TeslaRustor merged commit df8c346 into main Jun 14, 2024
11 checks passed
@TeslaRustor TeslaRustor deleted the en-539 branch June 14, 2024 06:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement] Optimize Auto Comment on PR
2 participants