Skip to content

[ISSUE #1867]🔨Update auto-comment-pr.yml #1868

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 19, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1867

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved formatting of automatic comments on pull requests for better clarity and visibility.
    • Retained functionality for adding specific labels to pull requests.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed unnecessary line breaks in comment formatting.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml to update the automatic pull request commenting mechanism. The changes focus on reformatting the comment body, using a more compact layout and introducing a block quote style for the note section. The workflow continues to trigger on pull_request_target events for the main branch and maintains the functionality of adding specific labels to the pull request.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml Updated comment formatting with more compact layout and block quote note style

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
[#1867] Update auto-comment-pr.yml

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 Workflow whispers, comments so bright,
A GitHub dance of formatting might,
Labels dancing, notes in quote,
Pulling requests with a rabbit's vote!
Compact and clear, the message sings! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm
🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!
💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note💥🚨:The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the enhancement⚡️ New feature or request label Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml (1)

Workflow permissions and token usage need adjustment

The workflow requires the following changes for better security:

  • Add explicit permissions block to limit the scope to only what's needed (issues and pull-requests)
  • Consider using GITHUB_TOKEN instead of BOT_TOKEN as it has built-in security restrictions
  • Current label additions may conflict with sync-issue-labels.yml workflow which also manages labels
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-47: Verify the workflow permissions and token scope

The workflow looks good overall, but it's important to ensure that the BOT_TOKEN has the necessary permissions to create comments and add labels.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the workflow file syntax and permissions

# Verify workflow file syntax
yamllint .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml

# Check for other similar workflows to ensure no conflicts
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "pull_request_target"

Length of output: 466


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of other workflows using pull_request_target to ensure no conflicts
# and verify the overall permissions setup

# Check the content of automerge workflow
echo "=== automerge.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/automerge.yml

# Check the content of auto_request_review workflow
echo -e "\n=== auto_request_review.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/auto_request_review.yml

# Check the content of sync-issue-labels workflow
echo -e "\n=== sync-issue-labels.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/sync-issue-labels.yml

# Check if any of these workflows define explicit permissions
echo -e "\n=== Checking for permissions blocks ==="
rg "permissions:" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 4772

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 25-25: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 28-28: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 32-32: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml (2)

27-28: Remove trailing spaces for consistent formatting

The greeting looks good, but there are trailing spaces that should be removed.

Apply this diff to fix the formatting:

-            🔊@${prCreator} 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!
-            
+            🔊@${prCreator} 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 28-28: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


31-33: Great use of GitHub's note callout syntax! Just fix the spacing.

The addition of > [!NOTE] improves the visibility of the important message. However, there are trailing spaces that should be removed.

Apply this diff to fix the formatting:

            > [!NOTE]
-            > 
+            >
            > 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 32-32: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22984ce and b25c3af.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml

[error] 28-28: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 32-32: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.27%. Comparing base (22984ce) to head (b25c3af).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1868   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.27%   28.27%           
=======================================
  Files         475      475           
  Lines       66559    66559           
=======================================
  Hits        18821    18821           
  Misses      47738    47738           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 98687d1 into main Dec 19, 2024
25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 19, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the op-1867 branch December 19, 2024 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Update auto-comment-pr.yml
3 participants