-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
[$250] Android-Onboarding - Nothing happens after selecting unsupported integrations and tap Continue #61932
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @VictoriaExpensify ( |
Triggered auto assignment to @thienlnam ( |
💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
not reproducible if we use Staging build and change 2025-05-14.2.00.01.AM.mp4 |
QA team found different issue (
Bug6830125_1747164811683.Screen_Recording_2025-05-13_at_10.15.57_PM.mp4it seems this issue have same root cause with 61932 , should we report as new GH issue ? |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021922450287393061662 |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @allgandalf ( |
I think this issue happens on OldDot only as |
Hello @rohit9625 , we couldn't repro issue when selecting Employee count as Small, i.e., 2025-05-14.9.39.52.AM.mp42025-05-14.9.39.54.AM.mp4 |
Offending PR - #60505 |
Oh, that's why I couldn't repro this issue on my end. That PR merged recently. However, by looking at the code in that PR and comparing it with the previous code I can see that some code is missing. Should I proceed with investigation or the PR author will take care of this?@shubham1206agra @mitarachim |
If we have the offending PR, let's go for a revert unless there's a very simple and 0-risk fix. There are already lot of deploy blockers at the moment, and potentially risking a fix that would cause further blockers will delay the next deploy even more. I prepared a revert PR here - @chiragsalian or @thienlnam feel free to go ahead and merge if there's no easy fix proposed and I'm offline. |
Well, I found the RCA of this issue and will create the proposal if prefer. It happens due this if condition: App/src/pages/OnboardingAccounting/BaseOnboardingAccounting.tsx Lines 226 to 232 in 23537ae
The getPlatform() !== CONST.PLATFORM.DESKTOP && onboardingCompanySize !== CONST.ONBOARDING_COMPANY_SIZE.MICRO And we returns from there if using Also, here we are not calling App/src/libs/actions/Report.ts Lines 4078 to 4083 in 23537ae
However, the above code was there even before the offending PR. So, if this issue doesn't happens after reverting that PR then we can consider refactoring |
I can see multiple holes in the implementation. It's best to revert for now |
Build is running to CP the revert PR: #61989 |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 9.1.45-0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Unable to check
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: #60505
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Device used: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 / Android 14
App Component: Other
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
App will redirect to OD.
Actual Result:
Nothing happens after selecting unsupported integrations and tapping Continue.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Screenshots/Videos
Bug6830037_1747160889962.Screen_Recording_20250514_022528_Expensify.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @allgandalfThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: