Skip to content

chore: cleanup unused vars #232

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

chore: cleanup unused vars #232

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

tchow-zlai
Copy link
Collaborator

@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai commented Jan 16, 2025

Summary

Checklist

  • Added Unit Tests
  • Covered by existing CI
  • Integration tested
  • Documentation update

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Code Refactoring

    • Simplified GCS class constructor by removing the project parameter.
    • Updated method calls and test cases to align with the new constructor signature.
  • Impact

    • Reduces complexity in object instantiation.
    • Maintains existing functionality while streamlining code structure.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GCS case class across multiple files in the Google Cloud Storage (GCS) integration module. The primary change involves removing the project parameter from the GCS class constructor, simplifying its instantiation in GCSFormat.scala, GcpFormatProvider.scala, and GCSFormatTest.scala. This change streamlines the class initialization while maintaining its core functionality for handling GCS file formats.

Changes

File Change Summary
cloud_gcp/src/main/scala/.../GCSFormat.scala Removed project parameter from GCS case class constructor
cloud_gcp/src/main/scala/.../GcpFormatProvider.scala Updated getFormat and resolveTableName methods to omit project parameter when creating GCS instance
cloud_gcp/src/test/scala/.../GCSFormatTest.scala Modified test cases to remove project parameter from GCS instantiation
cloud_gcp/src/test/scala/.../GcpFormatProviderTest.scala Removed assertion for project property in gcsFormat tests

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Reviewers

  • nikhil-zlai
  • david-zlai
  • piyush-zlai

Poem

🌥️ Farewell, project parameter bright,
Streamlined code takes graceful flight
GCS format, now lean and clean
Simplicity reigns supreme!
Cloud storage dances with delight 🚀

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

GitHub Actions: Resource not accessible by integration - https://docs.github.com/rest/actions/workflow-runs#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository.

Please grant the required permissions to the CodeRabbit GitHub App under the organization or repository settings.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ddaaf8 and 1e3e537.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • cloud_gcp/src/main/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GcpFormatProvider.scala (3 hunks)
  • cloud_gcp/src/test/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GCSFormatTest.scala (3 hunks)
  • cloud_gcp/src/test/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GcpFormatProviderTest.scala (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • cloud_gcp/src/test/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GcpFormatProviderTest.scala
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • cloud_gcp/src/main/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GcpFormatProvider.scala
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: scala_compile_fmt_fix
🔇 Additional comments (3)
cloud_gcp/src/test/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GCSFormatTest.scala (3)

56-56: LGTM! Consistent with previous change.


86-86: LGTM! Maintains date handling functionality.


36-36: LGTM! Verify project parameter removal impact.

✅ Verification successful

Project parameter removal verified and safe
The project parameter has been completely removed from the GCS class definition and all its usages across the codebase follow the new two-parameter pattern (sourceUri, fileFormat).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining usages of project parameter in GCS instantiations
rg -l 'GCS\([^)]*project' 

Length of output: 27


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find GCS class definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class GCS'

# Find all GCS instantiations
rg 'GCS\(' -A 1

Length of output: 10277


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

tchow-zlai and others added 2 commits January 16, 2025 17:26
Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c8322a and 9ddaaf8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • cloud_gcp/src/main/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GCSFormat.scala (1 hunks)
  • cloud_gcp/src/main/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GcpFormatProvider.scala (1 hunks)
  • cloud_gcp/src/test/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GCSFormatTest.scala (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • cloud_gcp/src/main/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GcpFormatProvider.scala
  • cloud_gcp/src/test/scala/ai/chronon/integrations/cloud_gcp/GCSFormatTest.scala
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: scala_compile_fmt_fix

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai merged commit 35d5d94 into main Jan 17, 2025
4 checks passed
@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai deleted the tchow/cleanup branch January 17, 2025 01:45
kumar-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
## Summary

## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Code Refactoring**
- Simplified `GCS` class constructor by removing the `project`
parameter.
- Updated method calls and test cases to align with the new constructor
signature.

- **Impact**
	- Reduces complexity in object instantiation.
	- Maintains existing functionality while streamlining code structure.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
kumar-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025
## Summary

## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Code Refactoring**
- Simplified `GCS` class constructor by removing the `project`
parameter.
- Updated method calls and test cases to align with the new constructor
signature.

- **Impact**
	- Reduces complexity in object instantiation.
	- Maintains existing functionality while streamlining code structure.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
chewy-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
## Summary

## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Code Refactoring**
- Simplified `GCS` class constructor by removing the `project`
parameter.
- Updated method calls and test cases to align with the new constructor
signature.

- **Impact**
	- Reduces complexity in object instantiation.
	- Maintains existing functionality while streamlining code structure.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
chewy-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
## Summary

## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Code Refactoring**
- Simplified `GCS` class constructor by removing the `project`
parameter.
- Updated method calls and test cases to align with the new constructor
signature.

- **Impact**
	- Reduces complexity in object instantiation.
	- Maintains existing functionality while streamlining code structure.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
chewy-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
## Summary

## Cheour clientslist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Code Refactoring**
- Simplified `GCS` class constructor by removing the `project`
parameter.
- Updated method calls and test cases to align with the new constructor
signature.

- **Impact**
	- Reduces complexity in object instantiation.
	- Maintains existing functionality while streamlining code structure.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to traour clients
the status of staour clientss when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Thomas Chow <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants