-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 451
DataFusion queries against new catalog #9367
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
timsaucer
wants to merge
17
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
tsaucer/new-catalog-datafusion
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
+3,394
−911
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Web viewer built successfully. If applicable, you should also test it:
Note: This comment is updated whenever you push a commit. |
d1cf2d8
to
88640b0
Compare
…y to find entities in the catalog. Also support filtering
… the platform in order to list partitions
4716df3
to
42ce89b
Compare
jleibs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2025
### Related Depends on: - #9416 which should be merged first ### What I hijacked @timsaucer 's previous work from: - #9367 This now goes through a generic TableEntry listing with both schema and table provided by the server. --------- Co-authored-by: Tim Saucer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Antoine Beyeler <[email protected]>
jprochazk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2025
### Related Depends on: - #9416 which should be merged first ### What I hijacked @timsaucer 's previous work from: - #9367 This now goes through a generic TableEntry listing with both schema and table provided by the server. --------- Co-authored-by: Tim Saucer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Antoine Beyeler <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
dataplatform
Rerun Data Platform integration
include in changelog
⛃ re_datastore
affects the datastore itself
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related
Closes https://github.com/rerun-io/dataplatform/issues/407
What
This PR includes methods for turning both request/response and streaming services from our GRPC definitions into DataFusion table providers. It expands the previous work and supersedes #9320
This code creates two different traits for conversion of either single response or streams of data into table providers.