-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
AOL bidder support #67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Hi @ikhemissi , |
Hi @mkendall07 , |
I was thinking of going this route but got turned off by having to gather referrer (as AOL defines it) + other user data that they want (I think they do get a geo, I can get relevant code from DAC). DAC + the pubAPI script (loaded by DAC) will add user data by default if you don't specify any I like this approach for speed/lightweight but I'm worried that it could hurt CPM by limiting AOL's access to impression context? my other concern would just be that aol would be turned off/have more friction if they don't see DAC.js (during integration) |
ok actually just answered my own question + realized we might want to either enable all of this for the adapter or add to bid params: you can enable/disable option to detect screen, flash version, timezone & geo (using html5 geo api if available) through DAC, right now it's all disabled in the other AOL adapter, going to check with our rep to see if it's something we should be doing -- here's screenshot of some of the DAC code -- it might be there just for adtech server in which case I don't think DAC brings as much benefit |
Thanks @ikhemissi and @nickjacob for the info. As a publisher AOL advices to use DAC, then I think that would be the preferred way to go. It may not be a good idea to tightly couple to the API directly, in case changes are made. I'll wait for confirmation from @nickjacob on AOL's preference here. |
Hey @nickjacob any more thoughts on this? |
Had a meeting w/ Wenda Zhou @aol yesterday; he's the product lead on marketplace client-side—hopefully he/his team will be contributing soon. They're recommending using DAC for now, since they'll be rolling out changes in the future to better support prebid. |
Hi guys, I have ended up using the DAC.js solution too. |
AOL already added with this PR: #55 |
…10.0 to master * commit 'b39f2b12a8ddfa650a8e04e3abd358e60371950a': Add changelog entry. Add new adapters for AOL analytics. Updated Prebid version Catch cross-origin DOMException (prebid#861) Add GumGum adapter (prebid#833) Remove duplicate log line in request bids (prebid#859) Utility function getBidIdParamater is misspelled Allow Conversant sizes to be overridden per placement (prebid#816) Add districtmDMX adapter (prebid#811) Truncate bids requested on clearPlacements (prebid#825) (prebid#828) Update adapters.json (prebid#803) Add usersyncing to AppNexus adapters (prebid#845) fixes for bugs in test suite (prebid#810) Pass user object parameters on bid request (prebid#821) fix rubicon deals to be per ad instead of per response (prebid#838) Links bidId in request with adId in response for analytics purposes (prebid#836) Bugfix/issue building from npm (prebid#823) Update build to only run `webpack` to improve build time performance (prebid#809) Cast all Conversant site_ids to a string (prebid#829) Increment pre version
Hi guys,
I wanted to discuss the addition of support for AOL.
I think we can achieve that by either calling their REST API directly (more or less the way I did it here) or by using their Javascript library DAC.js (the way @nickjacob did it in this commit prebid/Prebid.js/commit/da753b8569696e2c0bff353b370be1753bde8883).
Each solution has its advantages and its drawbacks :
What do you think ?