-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
Add comment for the plugins field in generic application config #5801
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add comment for the plugins field in generic application config #5801
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5801 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 27.14% 27.14% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 506 508 +2
Lines 53705 53803 +98
==========================================
+ Hits 14577 14603 +26
- Misses 38013 38084 +71
- Partials 1115 1116 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ type GenericApplicationSpec struct { | |||
// Configuration for drift detection | |||
DriftDetection *DriftDetection `json:"driftDetection"` | |||
// List of the plugin name | |||
// This field is plugin-specific, so intentionally restrict the access for the actual value here and decode it on the SDK side. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we should rewrite the above line either. Since it's not just list of plugin name anymore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, fixed 2dba71d
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍🏻
What this PR does:
as titlw
Why we need it:
We want to clarify why defined
spec.plugins
are empty struct.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Follow #5789
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: no