Skip to content

Drop deprecated namespace from tests #207

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2019
Merged

Drop deprecated namespace from tests #207

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2019

Conversation

enxebre
Copy link
Member

@enxebre enxebre commented Feb 13, 2019

dup of #203

@enxebre enxebre added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 13, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 13, 2019
@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented Feb 13, 2019 

level=error msg="Error: Error applying plan:"
level=error
level=error msg="1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* module.bootstrap.aws_s3_bucket.ignition: 1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* aws_s3_bucket.ignition: Error creating S3 bucket: TooManyBuckets: You have attempted to create more buckets than allowed"

@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented Feb 13, 2019

/test e2e-aws-operator

@enxebre enxebre mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2019
Closed
@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented Feb 13, 2019

/test e2e-aws-operator

@enxebre enxebre removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 13, 2019
@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented Feb 13, 2019

/test e2e-aws-operator

1 similar comment
@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented Feb 13, 2019

/test e2e-aws-operator

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ingvagabund

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 13, 2019
bison
bison approved these changes Feb 13, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@bison bison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2019
@frobware
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2732922 into openshift:master Feb 13, 2019
ingvagabund pushed a commit to ingvagabund/machine-api-operator that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot
Merge pull request openshift#207 from enxebre/revendor-drop-openshift…
3462b4f 
…-cluster

Revendor drop machine.openshift.io cluster
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bison bison bison approved these changes

@paulfantom paulfantom Awaiting requested review from paulfantom

Assignees

@bison bison

@frobware frobware

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@enxebre @ingvagabund @openshift-ci-robot @frobware @bison @openshift-merge-robot