-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
cli: Remove metrics annotation from namespaces removed from the mesh #4539
Conversation
Remove MetricsAnnotation fixes openservicemesh#4447 Signed-off-by: mudit singh <[email protected]>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4539 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.06% 69.08% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 217 217
Lines 14758 14759 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 10193 10196 +3
+ Misses 4514 4512 -2
Partials 51 51
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @mudit-01! Thank you so much for contributing this change!
The PR looks great. One tiny comment I have - it would tweak the title of the PR from Metrics annotation removal
to something like cli: Remove metrics annotation from namespaces removed from the mesh
The goal would be to:
- contextualize the PR to
cli
area -- when one glances at the subject/title - it is immediately evident that this is about the CLI component of OSM - provide context on when the metrics annotation is removed - when a namespace is removed from the mesh
LGTM
Signed-off-by: jaellio <[email protected]>
Thanks @draychev for the feedback |
Thanks, @snehachhabria for the review |
…penservicemesh#4539) Remove MetricsAnnotation fixes openservicemesh#4447. Update unit tests to test removal of metrics annotation. Signed-off-by: mudit singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: jaellio <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: jaellio <[email protected]>
Remove MetricsAnnotation fixes #4447
Signed-off-by: mudit singh [email protected]
Description:
Testing done: yes
Affected area:
Please answer the following questions with yes/no.
Does this change contain code from or inspired by another project?
Is this a breaking change?
Has documentation corresponding to this change been updated in the osm-docs repo (if applicable)?