[PRE REVIEW]: HistoJS: Web-Based Analytical Tool for Advancing Multiplexed Images

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @Mmasoud1 (Mohamed Masoud)
Repository: https://github.com/Mmasoud1/HistoJS
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @mooniean
Reviewers: @alexriss, @cinnetcrash
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/89cef01d776cda4e6d3cd988da2cae7e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/89cef01d776cda4e6d3cd988da2cae7e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/89cef01d776cda4e6d3cd988da2cae7e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/89cef01d776cda4e6d3cd988da2cae7e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Mmasoud1. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Mmasoud1 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=19.06 s (85.1 files/s, 102051.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                            24              2              0         803706
JavaScript                     879          96958         237383         482116
CSS                            156           2072           1572         206357
HTML                           279           2924            155          50366
TypeScript                       2            228              4          22883
LESS                           165           2963            140          21601
SVG                             71              4             67           5074
Sass                            20            215             93           3102
Markdown                        18            434              0           1924
Python                           1            578            371           1347
TeX                              1             34              0            120
YAML                             4              5              5             74
PHP                              1              2              0             32
XML                              1              0              0             23
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                          1622         106419         239790        1598725
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1248

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3389/fimmu.2022.981825 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1901.05350 is OK
- 10.7303/syn17865732 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1038/ncomms9390 may be a valid DOI for title: Highly multiplexed imaging of single cells using a high-throughput cyclic immunofluorescence method
- 10.1038/nm.3488 may be a valid DOI for title: Multiplexed ion beam imaging of human breast tumors

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.2307/2412323 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Minerva: a light-weight, narrative image browser for multiplexed tissue images
Submitting author: @thejohnhoffer
Handling editor: @jni (Retired)
Reviewers: @will-moore, @sofroniewn
Similarity score: 0.8497

dms-view: Interactive visualization tool for deep mutational scanning data
Submitting author: @skhilton
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @afrubin, @andrefaure, @thorvere
Similarity score: 0.8389

Nuclear Morphology Analysis 2.0.0: Improved image analysis software for measuring nuclear shape
Submitting author: @bmskinner
Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active)
Reviewers: @petebankhead, @suyashkumar
Similarity score: 0.8367

SpmImage Tycoon: Organize and analyze scanning probe microscopy data
Submitting author: @alexriss
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @jingpengw, @kasasxav
Similarity score: 0.8362

Heta compiler: a software tool for the development of large-scale QSP models and compilation into simulation formats
Submitting author: @metelkin
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @martinmodrak, @elimillera
Similarity score: 0.8315

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @fboehm as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Mmasoud1]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Minerva: a light-weight, narrative image browser for multiplexed tissue images
Submitting author: @thejohnhoffer
Handling editor: @jni (Retired)
Reviewers: @will-moore, @sofroniewn
Similarity score: 0.8497

dms-view: Interactive visualization tool for deep mutational scanning data
Submitting author: @skhilton
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @afrubin, @andrefaure, @thorvere
Similarity score: 0.8389

Nuclear Morphology Analysis 2.0.0: Improved image analysis software for measuring nuclear shape
Submitting author: @bmskinner
Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active)
Reviewers: @petebankhead, @suyashkumar
Similarity score: 0.8367

SpmImage Tycoon: Organize and analyze scanning probe microscopy data
Submitting author: @alexriss
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @jingpengw, @kasasxav
Similarity score: 0.8362

Heta compiler: a software tool for the development of large-scale QSP models and compilation into simulation formats
Submitting author: @metelkin
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @martinmodrak, @elimillera
Similarity score: 0.8315

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Mmasoud1]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0629 is OK
- 10.1038/ncomms9390 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.31657 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1300136110 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_30 is OK
- 10.2307/2412323 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.010 is OK
- 10.1038/nm.3488 is OK
- 10.3389/fimmu.2022.981825 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1901.05350 is OK
- 10.7303/syn17865732 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[Mmasoud1]

Thank you, @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, for taking care of this submission; the DOIs are fixed.

[Mmasoud1]

Dear @fboehm , let me know if I can help with anything please. Thank you.

[fboehm]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - Thank you for the invitation to edit this submission. I am seeking a new submission to edit, but I feel like this one's code base is a little outside my expertise. I am probably better suited to edit a R package or a python submission. For that reason, I feel that I should decline the invitation for now.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @mooniean as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[mooniean]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mooniean is now the editor

[mooniean]

Hi @Mmasoud1! Before I assign reviewers, is there anyone you'd like to suggest?

[Mmasoud1]

Hi @mooniean thank you for being the editor for our submission. I may suggest the following reviewers if they are available:

cinnetcrash
suresh-lab

[Mmasoud1]

Dear @mooniean is there anything else I can help with. Thanks!

[mooniean]

Hi @Mmasoud1 thank you for the suggestions! I'll send the reviewer invites soon

[mooniean]

Hi, @cinnetcrash @alexriss @suresh-lab - would you be available and interested in reviewing this submission for the Journal of Open Source Software?

HistoJS: Web-Based Analytical Tool for Advancing Multiplexed Images #6217

Thanks in advance!

[alexriss]

I can do it.

[cinnetcrash]

I can do it, too

[mooniean]

This is great! I'll assign you both as reviewers!

[mooniean]

@editorialbot add @alexriss as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[mooniean]

whoops, wrong syntax! let's try that again

[mooniean]

@editorialbot add @alexriss as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@alexriss added to the reviewers list!

[mooniean]

@editorialbot add @cinnetcrash as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@cinnetcrash added to the reviewers list!

[mooniean]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6317.