Skip to content

[PRE REVIEW]: Chitin Builder: a VMD tool for the generation of structures of chitin molecular crystals for atomistic simulations #5179

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 38 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: Chitin Builder: a VMD tool for the generation of structures of chitin molecular crystals for atomistic simulations #5179

editorialbot opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 38 comments
Assignees
@amoeba @majensen @WangKehan573
Labels
pre-review Shell Tcl TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Feb 21, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Submitting author: @jfaraudo (JORDI FARAUDO)
Repository: https://github.com/soft-matter-theory-at-icmab-csic/chitin_builder
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.0
Editor: @majensen
Reviewers: @amoeba, @WangKehan573
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c409d05d1e558827d1dea6275faf8965"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c409d05d1e558827d1dea6275faf8965/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c409d05d1e558827d1dea6275faf8965/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c409d05d1e558827d1dea6275faf8965)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jfaraudo. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jfaraudo if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials labels Feb 21, 2023
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author 

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (205.8 files/s, 45985.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TeX                              1             50              0            690
Tcl/Tk                           2             73            124            647
Markdown                         4            100              0            258
Bourne Shell                     1              8             16             22
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             9            232            144           1635
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 3611

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author 

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1021/ma0477246 is OK
- 10.1351/pac-rep-10-01-01 is OK
- 10.1021/bm201512t is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.03.010 is OK
- 10.1021/ma0203849 is OK
- 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.099 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4038883 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01653 is OK
- 10.1021/bm801251e is OK
- 10.1007/s10570-016-0968-0 is OK
- 10.1016/0166-218x(88)90012-1 is OK
- 10.1038/nature23268 is OK
- 10.1103/physrevlett.120.068001 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0039376 is OK
- 10.1021/ma102240r is OK
- 10.1021/ma0477246 is OK
- 10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9 is OK
- 10.1002/cben.201400025 is OK
- 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06372 is OK
- 10.1002/jcc.22959 is OK
- 10.1021/ct8002964 is OK
- 10.1021/ct200328p is OK
- 10.1081/MC-120006451 is OK
- 10.1351/pac-rep-10-01-01 is OK
- 10.1021/bm201512t is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.03.010 is OK
- 10.1021/ma0203849 is OK
- 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.099 is OK
- 10.1021/ct700301q is OK
- 10.1002/jcc.20291 is OK
- 10.1007/s12668-013-0097-2 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4038883 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b05999 is OK
- 10.1007/s10853-015-9271-y is OK
- 10.1016/J.CIS.2019.02.003 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01653 is OK
- 10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2017.08.076 is OK
- 10.1002/pola.20176 is OK
- 10.1021/bm801251e is OK
- 10.1007/s10570-016-0968-0 is OK
- 10.1002/jcc.20289 is OK
- 10.1016/0166-218x(88)90012-1 is OK
- 10.1039/C6GC00628K is OK
- 10.1039/C6RA00107F is OK
- 10.1038/nature23268 is OK
- 10.1103/physrevlett.120.068001 is OK
- 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0039376 is OK
- 10.1021/ma102240r is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot invite @majensen as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot Assign me as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @majensen is now the editor

@majensen
Copy link
Member

majensen commented Mar 6, 2023

Hi @symmy596 - would you have time and willingness to review this work for JOSS? I could use your expertise - thanks for considering.
-- @majensen

@majensen
Copy link
Member

majensen commented Mar 6, 2023

Hello @utf -- do you have time to review this work for JOSS? Thanks very much for your consideration-
--@majensen

@majensen
Copy link
Member

Hi @SiminaB - would you have time to review this work for JOSS? Thanks for you consideration, I hope your new job is going well! --@majensen

@majensen
Copy link
Member

All - apologies for the delay with this submission. Giving it full attention.

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@amoeba - would you be able to review this submission for JOSS? Thanks for considering - @majensen

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@dandavies99 - would you have time to review this submission for JOSS? I appreciate your consideration - thanks. --@majensen

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@mkhorton - would you consider reviewing this work for JOSS? Much obliged for your consideration- --@majensen

@mkhorton
Copy link

Hi Mark, have to decline this one, apologies. Recently took a new job and still in busy transition period, have to put reviewing on pause for a few months.

@majensen
Copy link
Member

Thanks @mkhorton - good luck in your new role!

@symmy596
Copy link

Hi Mark. I have to decline unfortunately. I have not worked in this field for a number of years so I am likely pretty rusty on the subject area. I have also recently moved jobs and I am busy with the change.

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@symmy596 appreciate your consideration!

@amoeba
Copy link

amoeba commented May 26, 2023

Hey @majensen, I can review this one.

@majensen
Copy link
Member

Much appreciated @amoeba !

@openjournals openjournals deleted a comment from editorialbot May 26, 2023
@openjournals openjournals deleted a comment from editorialbot May 26, 2023
@majensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot add @amoeba to reviewers

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@amoeba added to the reviewers list!

@majensen
Copy link
Member

Hi @dphansti - would you have time to review this work for JOSS? I would appreciate your expertise. --@majensen

@majensen
Copy link
Member

Hey @TomKellyGenetics - would you have time and interest in reviewing this work for JOSS? Thanks for considering- --@majensen

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@majensen 👋 please can you continue your search for reviewers

@dphansti
Copy link

dphansti commented Aug 10, 2023 via email

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@amritagos - I could really use your expertise reviewing this work for JOSS. Can you help? Thanks --@majensen

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@WangKehan573 - would you be able to review this work for the journal JOSS? I would welcome your expertise with the VMD framework here. Thanks --@majensen

@WangKehan573
Copy link

WangKehan573 commented Aug 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I am willing to review this paper. @majensen

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot add @WangKehan573 as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@WangKehan573 added to the reviewers list!

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@amoeba @WangKehan573 thanks very much for agreeing to review. @jfaraudo we'll finally get this review started - apologies for the very long delay.

@majensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #5771.

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Aug 21, 2023

The top 5 most similar JOSS papers are:

ViMMS 2.0: A framework to develop, test and optimise fragmentation strategies in LC-MS metabolomics
Reviewers: @jspaezp, @MKoesters
Similarity score: 0.795775191754251

MTEX2Gmsh: a tool for generating 2D meshes from EBSD data
Reviewers: @streeve, @ralfHielscher
Similarity score: 0.7901755944085497

GEMMI: A library for structural biology
Reviewers: @jamesrhester, @dominiquesydow
Similarity score: 0.78667981441994

FHI-vibes: Ab Initio Vibrational Simulations
Reviewers: @keipertk, @ajjackson
Similarity score: 0.7852457526328093

Chemiscope: interactive structure-property explorer for materials and molecules
Reviewers: @kblin, @mkhorton
Similarity score: 0.7840161893561871

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@amoeba amoeba

@majensen majensen

@WangKehan573 WangKehan573

Labels
pre-review Shell Tcl TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
9 participants
@amoeba @arfon @majensen @mkhorton @dphansti @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman @symmy596 @WangKehan573 @editorialbot