[ISSUE #2404]🤡Add transfer_msg_by_heap judgement for PopMessageProcessor in _process_request🧑💻 #2405
Conversation
…sor in _process_request🧑💻
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
rocketmq-rust-bot
requested review from
rocketmq-rust-bot,
SpaceXCN and
TeslaRustor
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！ 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！ Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs (1)
725-741: Implementation looks good, but error message could be more descriptive.The transfer_msg_by_heap implementation is well-structured and follows Rust's best practices. However, consider improving the unimplemented error message.
Apply this diff to enhance the error message:
- unimplemented!("transfer_msg_by_heap is false") + unimplemented!("Zero-copy message transfer is not yet implemented. Please enable transfer_msg_by_heap in broker config or wait for zero-copy implementation.")Also, consider adding a TODO comment for tracking the zero-copy implementation:
+ // TODO: Implement zero-copy message transfer functionality unimplemented!("Zero-copy message transfer is not yet implemented. Please enable transfer_msg_by_heap in broker config or wait for zero-copy implementation.")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs (1)
526-526: LGTM! Clear and helpful comment.The comment clearly explains the purpose of the
rest_numvariable, improving code readability.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2405 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 28.62% 28.61% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 507 507
Lines 73332 73337 +5
==========================================
Hits 20989 20989
- Misses 52343 52348 +5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #2404
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Refactor