-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
[ISSUE #2302]⚡️Optimize PopMessageProcessor#process_request #2303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a minor optimization in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs (1)
141-145
: Consider a more readable alternative while keeping the optimization.The current implementation cleverly uses Option combinators to handle the
BORN_TIME
field. While it's more concise, it might be less readable for developers not familiar with Rust's Option methods.Consider this alternative that maintains the optimization while being more explicit:
- if request - .get_ext_fields() - .and_then(|fields| fields.get(BORN_TIME).cloned()) - .map_or(true, |old| old == "0") - { + let should_set_time = match request.get_ext_fields() { + Some(fields) => fields.get(BORN_TIME).map_or(true, |old| old == "0"), + None => true + }; + if should_set_time {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pop_message_processor.rs
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2303 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 28.22% 28.22%
=======================================
Files 504 504
Lines 72417 72417
=======================================
Hits 20440 20440
Misses 51977 51977 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #2302
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit