Skip to content

Adding #[inline] for PopRequest method #1789

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

nakul-py
Copy link
Contributor

@nakul-py nakul-py commented Dec 14, 2024

Which Issue This PR Fixes

  • Add #[inline] for PopRequest method

Fixes #1786

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced multiple accessor and mutator methods for the PopRequest struct, enhancing its usability.
    • Added a new constructor method for initializing the PopRequest struct.
  • Improvements

    • Updated existing methods for better performance and encapsulation.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request enhances the PopRequest struct in the RocketMQ Rust client by introducing a new constructor and a series of accessor and mutator methods. Each method is marked with the #[inline] attribute to suggest inlining by the compiler, which may improve performance. The changes also include updates to the hash, eq, and fmt methods to ensure consistency with the new structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pop_request.rs - Added constructor and multiple getter/setter methods
- Marked methods with #[inline] attribute
- Updated hash, eq, and fmt implementations

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add #[inline] to PopRequest methods [#1786]

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • mxsm

Poem

🐰 Inline, optimize, make code shine bright,
Methods dancing with performance might!
PopRequest leaps with getter's grace,
Compiler's magic leaves no trace.
Rust's rabbit hops to speed's delight! 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. This feature will be included in our Pro Plan when released.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79fe0f7 and 279fdfb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pop_request.rs (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pop_request.rs

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@nakul-py 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pop_request.rs (2)

71-73: Consider adding validation in setters.

The setters for critical fields like consumer_group, message_queue, topic, and pop_process_queue lack validation. This could lead to invalid states.

Consider adding appropriate validations, for example:

#[inline]
pub fn set_topic(&mut self, topic: CheetahString) {
    if topic.is_empty() {
        panic!("Topic cannot be empty");
    }
    self.topic = topic;
}

Also applies to: 81-83, 91-93, 101-103


Line range hint 126-141: Document partial comparison behavior.

The Hash and PartialEq implementations only consider topic, consumer_group, and message_queue, ignoring other fields. While this might be intentional, it should be documented to prevent confusion.

Add documentation explaining the comparison behavior:

impl Hash for PopRequest {
    /// Generates a hash based only on topic, consumer_group, and message_queue.
    /// Other fields (pop_process_queue, locked_first, init_mode) are not considered
    /// as they don't affect the logical identity of the request.
    #[inline]
    fn hash<H: Hasher>(&self, state: &mut H) {
        // ... existing implementation ...
    }
}

impl PartialEq for PopRequest {
    /// Compares requests based only on topic, consumer_group, and message_queue.
    /// Other fields are not considered in the equality check.
    #[inline]
    fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
        // ... existing implementation ...
    }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 85ea6d2 and 79fe0f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pop_request.rs (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pop_request.rs (2)

Line range hint 38-55: LGTM! Constructor implementation is clean and follows best practices.

The #[inline] attribute is appropriate for this simple constructor, and the implementation properly initializes all fields with a sensible default for locked_first.


119-122: LGTM! MessageRequest trait implementation is correct.

The #[inline] attribute is appropriate for this simple constant-returning method.

Comment on lines +106 to 113
#[inline]
pub fn get_init_mode(&self) -> i32 {
self.init_mode
}

#[inline]
pub fn set_init_mode(&mut self, init_mode: i32) {
self.init_mode = init_mode;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider documenting and constraining init_mode values.

The init_mode field uses i32 without documentation or value constraints. This could lead to misuse or confusion about valid values.

Consider:

  1. Adding documentation about valid values and their meanings
  2. Using an enum instead of i32 for type safety
  3. Adding validation in the setter
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum InitMode {
    Normal = 0,
    // Add other valid modes...
}

impl PopRequest {
    #[inline]
    pub fn get_init_mode(&self) -> InitMode {
        // Convert stored i32 to enum
    }

    #[inline]
    pub fn set_init_mode(&mut self, mode: InitMode) {
        self.init_mode = mode as i32;
    }
}

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.20%. Comparing base (85ea6d2) to head (279fdfb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1789   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.20%   28.20%           
=======================================
  Files         467      467           
  Lines       64765    64765           
=======================================
  Hits        18265    18265           
  Misses      46500    46500           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nakul-py Please use

cargo fmt

to fix CI error

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@nakul-py 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mxsm mxsm added the approved PR has approved label Dec 14, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 7b6df5d into mxsm:main Dec 14, 2024
18 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge Difficulty level/Easy Easy ISSUE enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Add #[inline] for PopRequest method
4 participants