[ISSUE #1236]Add #[inline] for DefaultRemotingRequestProcessor#process_request #1237
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the addition of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1237 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 18.03% 18.03%
=======================================
Files 428 428
Lines 53549 53549
=======================================
Hits 9655 9655
Misses 43894 43894 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/request_processor/default_request_processor.rs (1)
29-29: Document the rationale for explicit inlining.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why explicit inlining is beneficial here, as it helps future maintainers understand the performance considerations that led to this decision.
+ // Explicitly inline this method to reduce overhead in the request processing hot path #[inline]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/request_processor/default_request_processor.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/request_processor/default_request_processor.rs (1)
Line range hint 29-35: LGTM, but verify performance impact.
The addition of #[inline] is reasonable for this simple method. However, since the method is async and the compiler often makes good inlining decisions automatically, it would be valuable to measure the actual performance impact.
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1236
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
These changes enhance the responsiveness and efficiency of the application, leading to a smoother user experience.