Skip to content

[ISSUE #1536]📝Update README.md #1537

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

[ISSUE #1536]📝Update README.md #1537

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 4, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1536

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the project introduction for clarity, emphasizing that RocketMQ-Rust is a Rust library.
    • Removed the term "Unofficial" to enhance the project's recognition.
    • Revised the roadmap section to include specific release dates for future updates.
    • Maintained existing commands and sections related to message sending and available modules.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on updating the README.md file for the RocketMQ-Rust project. Key modifications include clarifying the project's purpose as a Rust library, removing the term "Unofficial," and enhancing the features and roadmap sections with specific release dates. The command syntax for running the name server and broker remains unchanged, ensuring that the functionality is preserved while improving the document's clarity and organization.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated introduction, removed "Unofficial" label, enhanced roadmap with dates.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update README.md (Issue #1536)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, we hop and play,
With README updates brightening the way.
No more "Unofficial," we proudly declare,
A roadmap to guide us, with clarity rare.
So let’s send our messages, swift as a breeze,
In the world of RocketMQ, we code with ease! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 4, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)

Line range hint 39-49: Enhance the roadmap with feature information and flexible timelines

While having a timeline is good, consider these improvements:

  1. Add brief descriptions of planned features/improvements for each version
  2. Use quarters or seasons instead of specific dates for long-term releases (e.g., "Q2 2025" instead of "2025-05-17")
  3. Consider limiting the timeline to 12-18 months to maintain realistic expectations

This will make the roadmap more informative and maintainable.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~3-~3: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 4167 characters long)
Context: .../github/last-commit/mxsm/rocketmq-rust) Crates.io Docs.rs CI [![CodeCov][codecov-image]][codecov-url] GitHub contributors Crates.io License ![GitHub repo size](https://img.shields.i...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)


Line range hint 108-108: Fix incorrect command description

The line "Run the following command to start the name server" should be "Run the following command to start the broker" as this section is about broker configuration.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~3-~3: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 4167 characters long)
Context: .../github/last-commit/mxsm/rocketmq-rust) Crates.io Docs.rs CI [![CodeCov][codecov-image]][codecov-url] GitHub contributors Crates.io License ![GitHub repo size](https://img.shields.i...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)


Line range hint 52-108: Enhance configuration documentation

Consider adding:

  1. A table of default configuration values
  2. Examples of common configuration scenarios
  3. Environment variable overrides, if supported
  4. System requirements (memory, disk space, etc.)

This will help users better understand the configuration options and system requirements.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~3-~3: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 4167 characters long)
Context: .../github/last-commit/mxsm/rocketmq-rust) Crates.io Docs.rs CI [![CodeCov][codecov-image]][codecov-url] GitHub contributors Crates.io License ![GitHub repo size](https://img.shields.i...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)


Documentation links need to be fixed

Several repository links are malformed or invalid:

  • Internal repository links with incorrect format:

    • README.md:https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/tree/main/rocketmq-client/examples
    • README.md:https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/tree/main/rocketmq-namesrv
    • README.md:https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/tree/main/rocketmq-broker
    • README.md:https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/tree/main/rocketmq-store
    • README.md:https://github.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/tree/main/rocketmq-client
  • Apache RocketMQ links that need verification:

    • README.md:https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.3.1
    • README.md:https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/develop/docs

Please fix the link formatting by removing the file prefix (e.g., "README.md:") from the URLs and verify that the Apache RocketMQ links point to the correct branches and paths.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 110-124: Verify documentation links

Let's ensure all documentation links are valid and accessible.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all documentation links are valid

# Extract and verify internal repository links
echo "Checking internal links..."
rg -o 'https://github\.com/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/(?:blob|tree)/[^)"]+' | while read -r link; do
  gh api "repos/mxsm/rocketmq-rust/contents/${link#*blob/*/}" --jq '.path' || echo "Invalid link: $link"
done

# Extract and verify Apache RocketMQ documentation links
echo "Checking Apache RocketMQ links..."
rg -o 'https://github\.com/apache/rocketmq/(?:blob|tree)/[^)"]+' | while read -r link; do
  curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "$link" | grep -q "200" || echo "Invalid link: $link"
done

Length of output: 5097

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~3-~3: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 4167 characters long)
Context: .../github/last-commit/mxsm/rocketmq-rust) Crates.io Docs.rs CI [![CodeCov][codecov-image]][codecov-url] GitHub contributors Crates.io License ![GitHub repo size](https://img.shields.i...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 39dc3a0 and 2fb9df7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +5 to 8
Welcome to [Apache Rocketmq](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq) Rust implementation. **RocketMQ-Rust(Rust library)** is
a reimplementation of the Apache RocketMQ message middleware in the Rust language. This project aims to provide Rust
developers with a high-performance and reliable message queue service, making full use of the features of the Rust
language.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Clarify the project's relationship with Apache RocketMQ

The current introduction might imply this is an official Apache project. Consider adding a clear disclaimer about the project's status, such as "This is a community-driven Rust implementation of Apache RocketMQ, not officially affiliated with the Apache Software Foundation."

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.85%. Comparing base (39dc3a0) to head (2fb9df7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1537   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   24.85%   24.85%           
=======================================
  Files         450      450           
  Lines       59525    59525           
=======================================
  Hits        14795    14795           
  Misses      44730    44730           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit c5c88cd into main Dec 4, 2024
25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 4, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the doc-1536 branch December 4, 2024 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Doc📝] Update README.md
4 participants