Skip to content

[ISSUE #1368]📝Update README.md #1369

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

[ISSUE #1368]📝Update README.md #1369

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 27, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1368

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new "Roadmap" section to the README.md file, clarifying the basis for the RocketMQ-Rust implementation and outlining release timelines for versions v0.1.0 through v0.9.0.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the README.md file. A new section under the "Roadmap" heading has been added, clarifying that the RocketMQ-Rust implementation is based on Apache RocketMQ release 5.3.1. The roadmap table has been updated to include release timelines for versions v0.1.0 through v0.9.0, with future versions marked as "🚧" to indicate pending status. No other sections or functionalities of the README were altered.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added a new section under "Roadmap" detailing the RocketMQ-Rust implementation and updated the roadmap table with release timelines for versions v0.1.0 to v0.9.0.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update README.md

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

approved, auto merge, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

Poem

In the README, a roadmap shines,
For RocketMQ, our code aligns.
With future plans all marked with care,
🚧 signals growth, we're almost there!
A journey mapped, our path is clear,
Hop along, the launch is near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 27, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

25-25: Remove trailing period from heading

The content providing version base information is valuable. However, to follow markdown conventions, remove the trailing period from the heading.

-### **🔊Note**: ***Rocketmq-rust*** is implemented based on ***Apache Rocketmq release-5.3.1📌(Tag)***, with subsequent feature enhancements to follow the updates of the version🚩.
+### **🔊Note**: ***Rocketmq-rust*** is implemented based on ***Apache Rocketmq release-5.3.1📌(Tag)***, with subsequent feature enhancements to follow the updates of the version🚩
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

25-25: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)


Line range hint 27-42: Consider using quarters instead of specific dates for future releases

The roadmap table is well-structured and provides excellent transparency. However, for future releases (v0.4.0 onwards), consider using quarters (e.g., "Q1 2025") instead of specific dates. This provides more flexibility while maintaining clear expectations.

The current structure with specific dates might create unnecessary pressure to meet exact deadlines, especially for releases planned far into the future.

 | 🔖v0.1.0  | 🚩2024-01-28   | Released🎉 |
 | 🔖v0.2.0  | 🚩2024-06-05   | Released🎉 |
 | 🔖v0.3.0  | 🚩2024-11-17   | Released🎉 |
-| 🔖v0.4.0  | 🚩2025-02-17   | 🚧         |
-| 🔖v0.5.0  | 🚩2025-05-17   | 🚧         |
-| 🔖v0.6.0  | 🚩2025-08-17   | 🚧         |
+| 🔖v0.4.0  | 🚩Q1 2025      | 🚧         |
+| 🔖v0.5.0  | 🚩Q2 2025      | 🚧         |
+| 🔖v0.6.0  | 🚩Q3 2025      | 🚧         |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~30-~30: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...ase a new version every three months to fix issues. If there are major updates or n...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

25-25: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)


28-28: null
Images should have alternate text (alt text)

(MD045, no-alt-text)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3890f7a and 1c17d56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
README.md

25-25: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.03%. Comparing base (3890f7a) to head (1c17d56).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1369   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   21.03%   21.03%           
=======================================
  Files         434      434           
  Lines       55191    55191           
=======================================
  Hits        11611    11611           
  Misses      43580    43580           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Doc📝] Update README.md
4 participants