Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add and unify HEIR backend options for CGGI schemes #1645

Open
asraa opened this issue Apr 2, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

add and unify HEIR backend options for CGGI schemes #1645

asraa opened this issue Apr 2, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@asraa
Copy link
Collaborator

asraa commented Apr 2, 2025

Follow-up for #1573

Only jaxite uses a parallelism toggle, whereas we should also add that in for FPT / tfhe-rs.

The RLWE backend options also has debug handlers, and we should test/ add that for CGGI pipelines

copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2025
Follow-ups:
* I'd also like to unify the arith-to-cggi (non-Yosys) paths with the `--mlir-to-cggi` but I don't know how possible it is given the compile time yosys dependency. I think I could make it work, tbh. In a follow-up #1646
* All the backends that support parallism should use the JaxiteBackendOptions, for now I just wanted to maintain parity with the codebase so only the jaxite pipeline has this option. #1645

fixes #1573

PiperOrigin-RevId: 741191624
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2025
Follow-ups:
* I'd also like to unify the arith-to-cggi (non-Yosys) paths with the `--mlir-to-cggi` but I don't know how possible it is given the compile time yosys dependency. I think I could make it work, tbh. In a follow-up #1646
* All the backends that support parallism should use the JaxiteBackendOptions, for now I just wanted to maintain parity with the codebase so only the jaxite pipeline has this option. #1645

fixes #1573

PiperOrigin-RevId: 741191624
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2025
Follow-ups:
* I'd also like to unify the arith-to-cggi (non-Yosys) paths with the `--mlir-to-cggi` but I don't know how possible it is given the compile time yosys dependency. I think I could make it work, tbh. In a follow-up #1646
* All the backends that support parallism should use the JaxiteBackendOptions, for now I just wanted to maintain parity with the codebase so only the jaxite pipeline has this option. #1645

fixes #1573

PiperOrigin-RevId: 741191624
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2025
Follow-ups:
* I'd also like to unify the arith-to-cggi (non-Yosys) paths with the `--mlir-to-cggi` but I don't know how possible it is given the compile time yosys dependency. I think I could make it work, tbh. In a follow-up #1646
* All the backends that support parallism should use the JaxiteBackendOptions, for now I just wanted to maintain parity with the codebase so only the jaxite pipeline has this option. #1645

fixes #1573

PiperOrigin-RevId: 741191624
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2025
Follow-ups:
* I'd also like to unify the arith-to-cggi (non-Yosys) paths with the `--mlir-to-cggi` but I don't know how possible it is given the compile time yosys dependency. I think I could make it work, tbh. In a follow-up #1646
* All the backends that support parallism should use the JaxiteBackendOptions, for now I just wanted to maintain parity with the codebase so only the jaxite pipeline has this option. #1645

fixes #1573

PiperOrigin-RevId: 741191624
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2025
Follow-ups:
* I'd also like to unify the arith-to-cggi (non-Yosys) paths with the `--mlir-to-cggi` but I don't know how possible it is given the compile time yosys dependency. I think I could make it work, tbh. In a follow-up #1646
* All the backends that support parallism should use the JaxiteBackendOptions, for now I just wanted to maintain parity with the codebase so only the jaxite pipeline has this option. #1645

fixes #1573

PiperOrigin-RevId: 743253257
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2025

This issue has 1 outstanding TODOs:

This comment was autogenerated by todo-backlinks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant