Revert commit ebfa961 and close #1849 #1851
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…he loop number did not start at 0 but at 32 (the initialized defulat size), and would be constantly increasing in size at each new level of nested loop. May even had an incidence on the loop speed." This reverts commit ebfa961.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#1849 arised after #1778 was introduced following #1766.
Although the motivation of #1766 still helds, the #1788 solution creates a problem with "EXECUTE" (that uses the caller environment). Until the situation is clearer, best is to revert to the 'old' code that is perhaps less optimized but works in all known cases.
This reverts commit ebfa961.