Use be_nil and be_true/be_false everywhere in specs
#15867
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
straight-shoota
changed the title
be_nil and be_true/be_false in specsbe_nil and be_true/be_false everywhere in specs
ysbaddaden
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Transforms all
eq nilandeq true/eq falsecalls in specs tobe_nilandbe_true/be_falseto enforce a consistent style.We're already using
be_*in the vast majority of cases. Less than 10% of expectations are using theeqstyle.This was discovered with ameba's
Lint/SpecEqWithBoolOrNilLiteralrule.