Skip to content

docs: What to do when there is a custom license #11720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 18, 2022

Conversation

prince-chrismc
Copy link
Contributor

Docs!

this came up in conan-io#11121 and I am trying to capture the information
@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@prince-chrismc
Copy link
Contributor Author

I really dont like how many places this has gone.

Open to any suggestions 🙏

@prince-chrismc prince-chrismc mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2022
4 tasks
@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@conan-center-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Updating docs!

Copy link
Member

@uilianries uilianries left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a good solution, IHMO. So far, we needed to read and get the license name from the file, which now always work, as they vary the name according the interpretation.

@conan-center-bot conan-center-bot merged commit dada12f into conan-io:master Jul 18, 2022
AndreyMlashkin pushed a commit to AndreyMlashkin/conan-center-index that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2022
* docs: what to do when there is a custom license

this came up in conan-io#11121 and I am trying to capture the information

* link hook rules to FAQ

* also put it in the faq

* relative link same as conan-io#10639

* Update reviewing.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants