Move some non-core dependencies to the apache-airflow meta package
#49846
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
potiuk
added
the
backport-to-v3-0-test
|
@ashb -> I think this is what you referred to recently ? The remaining extras in |
potiuk
added
the
full tests needed
Some of the extras in `airflow-core` do not really belong there, they should be moved to the `apache-airflow` meta-package.
potiuk
force-pushed
the
cleanup-airflow-core-optional-dependencies
branch
from
ccae1b1 to
65053f7
Compare
|
OK. That one looks good. |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
…eta package (#49846) Some of the extras in `airflow-core` do not really belong there, they should be moved to the `apache-airflow` meta-package. (cherry picked from commit 3730cba) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
Backport successfully created: v3-0-test
|
|
cool :) |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to aws-mwaa/upstream-to-airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
…eta package (apache#49846) Some of the extras in `airflow-core` do not really belong there, they should be moved to the `apache-airflow` meta-package. (cherry picked from commit 3730cba) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
potiuk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
…eta package (#49846) (#49858) Some of the extras in `airflow-core` do not really belong there, they should be moved to the `apache-airflow` meta-package. (cherry picked from commit 3730cba) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
potiuk
added a commit
to potiuk/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
…eta package (apache#49846) Some of the extras in `airflow-core` do not really belong there, they should be moved to the `apache-airflow` meta-package. (cherry picked from commit 3730cba) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
jroachgolf84
pushed a commit
to jroachgolf84/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…pache#49846) Some of the extras in `airflow-core` do not really belong there, they should be moved to the `apache-airflow` meta-package.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some of the extras in
airflow-coredo not really belong there, they should be moved to theapache-airflowmeta-package.^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.