-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
[Due for payment 2025-05-22] [$250] Reports - Outstanding tooltip in Reports > Tasks mentions "expenses" instead of "tasks" #61631
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @RachCHopkins ( |
Triggered auto assignment to @robertjchen ( |
💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Reports - Outstanding tooltip in Reports > Tasks mentions "expenses" instead of "tasks" What is the root cause of that problem?Here's the logic to render the outstanding tooltip App/src/components/Search/SearchPageHeader/SearchStatusBar.tsx Lines 272 to 275 in bd59655
And notice it does not check for the selected type to render the tooltip. What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?Change condition to isScreenFocused && !isOutstandingStatusActive && (queryJSON.type === CONST.SEARCH.DATA_TYPES.EXPENSE), App/src/components/Search/SearchPageHeader/SearchStatusBar.tsx Lines 272 to 275 in bd59655
this will ensure the tooltip is only visible when type is What specific scenarios should we cover in automated tests to prevent reintroducing this issue in the future?NA What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)Reminder: Please use plain English, be brief and avoid jargon. Feel free to use images, charts or pseudo-code if necessary. Do not post large multi-line diffs or write walls of text. Do not create PRs unless you have been hired for this job. |
I could raise a quick PR if needed here. |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021920365115012200876 |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @hungvu193 ( |
@ChavdaSachin 's proposal here looks good to me! 🎀 👀 🎀 |
Current assignee @robertjchen is eligible for the choreEngineerContributorManagement assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
❌ There was an error making the offer to @ChavdaSachin for the Contributor role. The BZ member will need to manually hire the contributor. |
LGTM! |
Raising PR within a couple hours. |
PR ready for review |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.1.45-21 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-05-22. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
@hungvu193 @RachCHopkins @hungvu193 The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
I have applied for the job on upwork. |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 9.1.42-0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Unable to check
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Exp
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Device used: Mac 15.3 / Chrome
App Component: Search
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Outstanding tooltip content will explain the task outstanding tab.
Actual Result:
Outstanding tooltip in Tasks tab shows "Filter for expenses that need approval", which does not explain the tasks.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Screenshots/Videos
Bug6825026_1746664229005.20250508_080833.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @RachCHopkinsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: