Skip to content

revert(focus-trap): drop focus-trap options causing inconsistent focus behavior #6483

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jcfranco
Copy link
Member

Related Issue: #6281 #6454

Summary

Reverts 764609d and df144dc to give us more time to look into other scenarios where focus is being blocked after updating focus-trap configuration.

@jcfranco jcfranco requested a review from a team as a code owner February 15, 2023 18:35
@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore Issues with changes that don't modify src or test files. label Feb 15, 2023
@jcfranco jcfranco added pr ready for visual snapshots Adding this label will run visual snapshot testing. p - high Issue should be addressed in the current milestone, impacts component or core functionality and removed chore Issues with changes that don't modify src or test files. labels Feb 15, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@anveshmekala anveshmekala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jcfranco jcfranco merged commit 68f2c0e into master Feb 15, 2023
@jcfranco jcfranco deleted the jcfranco/revert-focus-trap-changes-causing-inconsistent-focus-behavior branch February 15, 2023 20:58
jcfranco added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2023
…onent

* restores changes reverted by #6483
* bumps focus-trap dep
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
p - high Issue should be addressed in the current milestone, impacts component or core functionality pr ready for visual snapshots Adding this label will run visual snapshot testing.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants