Skip to content

Make converter optional #28536

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 22, 2024
Merged

Make converter optional #28536

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

mackjmr
Copy link
Member

@mackjmr mackjmr commented Aug 19, 2024

What does this PR do?

This PR makes the converter optional in OTel agent. It is enabled by default, but users now have an option to disable it in agent config.

Motivation

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

Run the agent with the otelcollector.converter.enabled set to false (or via env DD_OTELCOLLECTOR_CONVERTER_ENABLED=false and ensure the collector config does not get enhanced)

@mackjmr mackjmr requested review from a team as code owners August 19, 2024 13:36
@mackjmr mackjmr requested a review from ankitpatel96 August 19, 2024 13:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added team/opentelemetry OpenTelemetry team [deprecated] team/agent-shared-components Deprecated. Use team/agent-configuration or team/agent-runtimes labels instead. labels Aug 19, 2024
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=42253320 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 356a2ae

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 4de6e420-03a2-4fb7-a4c1-90e9e250a88d Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 3923572
Comparison: 356a2ae

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
pycheck_1000_100byte_tags % cpu utilization +1.59 [-3.31, +6.48] Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +1.22 [+0.32, +2.13] Logs
idle memory utilization +0.82 [+0.78, +0.87] Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.17 [-0.98, +0.64] Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.71 [-0.82, -0.60] Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -1.90 [-4.56, +0.77] Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -5.99 [-18.52, +6.54] Logs

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@mackjmr
Copy link
Member Author

mackjmr commented Aug 20, 2024

/merge -c

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Aug 20, 2024

⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

This merge request was unqueued

If you need support, contact us on Slack #devflow!

@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from dd-devflow bot Aug 20, 2024
Copy link
Member

@hush-hush hush-hush left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good for the files owned by ASC

@mackjmr
Copy link
Member Author

mackjmr commented Aug 22, 2024

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Aug 22, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 25m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit cc74c19 into main Aug 22, 2024
221 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the mackjmr/make-converter-optional branch August 22, 2024 08:52
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.58.0 milestone Aug 22, 2024
truthbk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog [deprecated] team/agent-shared-components Deprecated. Use team/agent-configuration or team/agent-runtimes labels instead. team/opentelemetry OpenTelemetry team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants