Skip to content

chore: fix BigQuery v3 test cases #1031

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

goldmedal
Copy link
Contributor

@goldmedal goldmedal commented Jan 9, 2025

Changed

  • the number of functions
  • the format of floating value

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated test case for BigQuery function list to expect 34 functions instead of 35
    • Modified test query assertion to expect o_totalprice as a string value instead of a float

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request contains modifications to two test files in the BigQuery connector section of the ibis-server project. The changes involve adjusting test assertions in two different test functions: one modifying the expected function count and another changing the data type of a price value from numeric to string. These updates appear to be fine-tuning test expectations to match current implementation details.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/routers/v3/connector/bigquery/test_functions.py Reduced expected function count from DATAFUSION_FUNCTION_COUNT + 35 to DATAFUSION_FUNCTION_COUNT + 34
tests/routers/v3/connector/bigquery/test_query.py Changed o_totalprice assertion from numeric 356711.63 to string "356711.63"

Suggested labels

bigquery, python

Suggested reviewers

  • wwwy3y3

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Test Tale 🧪

In BigQuery's realm of code so bright,
One function less, a numeric slight,
A price now wrapped in string's embrace,
Our tests dance with playful grace!
Hop, hop, assertions take their flight! 🚀

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added ibis python Pull requests that update Python code labels Jan 9, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b816a5 and 49c29b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ibis-server/tests/routers/v3/connector/bigquery/test_functions.py (1 hunks)
  • ibis-server/tests/routers/v3/connector/bigquery/test_query.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: ci
🔇 Additional comments (1)
ibis-server/tests/routers/v3/connector/bigquery/test_query.py (1)

90-90: Review data type consistency

There's a potential inconsistency in the test:

  1. The test value is now a string "356711.63"
  2. The dtype assertion still expects "float64"
  3. The manifest defines the column as "double"

Please verify if this change aligns with BigQuery's actual behavior for numeric value serialization.

Run this script to verify BigQuery's behavior:

✅ Verification successful

String representation is compatible with float64 type

The string representation "356711.63" is consistent with BigQuery's serialization behavior while maintaining the float64 type system. This is verified by:

  • BigQuery connector uses "double" in manifest (schema) definitions
  • All connectors consistently handle numeric types as float64 in pandas
  • String serialization doesn't affect the underlying type system
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for similar numeric value handling in other test files

# Search for numeric value assertions in test files
echo "Checking numeric value handling in other test files:"
rg -A 2 'o_totalprice.*float|double' tests/

Length of output: 207


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, find the exact path of the test file
fd "test_query.py" 

# Then examine the content focusing on dtype assertions and numeric handling
echo "=== Checking dtype assertions and numeric handling ==="
rg -A 3 "dtype.*float|o_totalprice.*float|double" $(fd "test_query.py")

# Look for manifest definitions
echo "=== Checking manifest definitions ==="
fd "manifest.json" | xargs rg "o_totalprice"

Length of output: 10633

@goldmedal goldmedal merged commit 2072fef into Canner:main Jan 9, 2025
7 checks passed
@goldmedal goldmedal deleted the chore/fix-bigquery-v3-test branch January 9, 2025 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ibis python Pull requests that update Python code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants