6.1 Deployment

[bhombot-ci]

MidasCivil_Toolkit

Compliance

• Update AssemblyFileVersion to 6.1
• Update Copyright Headers to 2023

External-api-changes

• Add support for MidasCivil 2022
  • Added support for MidasCivil 2021 (all versions) to MidasCivil 2022 (up to v2.1) which only impacts SurfaceProperty, Constaint6DOF and LoadCombination
  • Fixed bug where AreaUniformlyDistributedLoads were not being pushed as the parsing had been amended in 9.1.0.
• Align with migration of Structures datasets to subfolder

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check beta-merge-status

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check beta-merge-status

There are 56 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check beta-merge-status

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check beta-merge-status

There are 55 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[bhombot-ci]

MERGE REPORT - 2023-03-19 15:17.

DETAILS:
This pull request can be merged or not merged without impact on any of its upstream dependencies..

[StephennipBH]

The functionality of push pull of bar and femesh elements under different properties have been tested. Loadings have not been tested yet

[FraserGreenroyd]

Owing to a lack of reviews signing off this repository for all of the changes proposed to this beta, I am unable to deploy this pull request to the 6.1 beta. Unfortunately it is also blocked by the inability to deploy one or more of the repositories higher up in this repositories dependency chain.

If there is sufficient demand, we may be able to look at doing a 6.1 beta patch and include it prior to the 6.2 beta.

I am closing this pull request to tidy up and complete the 6.1 deployment. The work will not be lost, and will be eligible for inclusion in the 6.2 beta if it is not deployed via a beta patch prior to the 6.2 beta.

[bhombot-ci]

@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a check-installer result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on BHoM

[bhombot-ci]

@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a check-versioning result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on BHoM

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check compliance
@BHoMBot check null-handling
@BHoMBot check serialisation
@BHoMBot check core

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check branch-compliance
• check dataset-compliance
• check copyright-compliance
• check null-handling
• check serialisation
• check core

There are 34 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check compliance
@BHoMBot check null-handling
@BHoMBot check serialisation
@BHoMBot check core

[bhombot-ci]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check branch-compliance
• check dataset-compliance
• check copyright-compliance
• check null-handling
• check serialisation
• check core

There are 14 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[bhombot-ci]

@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a check-versioning result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on Revit_Toolkit

[bhombot-ci]

@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a check-installer result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on Revit_Toolkit

[peterjamesnugent]

Approved as code is identical to #344:

Checked using the two following scripts:
Structures - Create - Read - Update - Elements
Structures - Create read loads

Both loaded in to MidasCivil correctly, no errors (apart from unsupported loads).

There were some reported different values, but I suspect it's due to the same names being used (I made a separate script for previous installers) - a few spot checks confirmed the same loads were pushing/pulled and shown in the software.

[bhombot-ci]

FAO: @FraserGreenroyd
@FraserGreenroyd is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate.

The check they wish to have dispensation on is beta-documentation-compliance.

If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with:

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 12326508415

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 12326508415

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd I have now provided a passing check on reference 12326508415 as requested.

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check ready-to-merge

There are 18 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[FraserGreenroyd]

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am requesting neutral checks on: ready-to-merge

[bhombot-ci]

@FraserGreenroyd I have provided neutral checks to the checks requested. These checks will need to be run properly to obtain full results.