Skip to content

Board Review: Introducing Azure EASM #5062

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
nathanfalke opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

Board Review: Introducing Azure EASM #5062

nathanfalke opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
@ronniegeraghty @kyle-patterson
Labels
architecture board-review Request for an Architectural Board Review Defender

Comments

@nathanfalke
Copy link
Member

nathanfalke commented Nov 7, 2022 •
edited by markweitzel
Loading

Contacts and Timeline

About the Service

About the client library

  • Name of client library:
    • Azure-EASM
    • Azure-Mgmt-EASM
  • Link to library reference documentation:
  • Is there an existing SDK library? If yes, provide link:
    • No.

Step 1: Champion Scenarios

Step 2: Quickstart Samples (Optional)

API Stewardship Board Review

  • Please refer to #7029 for API Review notes
@nathanfalke nathanfalke added architecture board-review Request for an Architectural Board Review labels Nov 7, 2022
@nathanfalke nathanfalke changed the title Board Review: Introducing <client library name> Board Review: Introducing Azure EASM Nov 7, 2022
@ronniegeraghty
Copy link
Member

Drafted

@ronniegeraghty
Copy link
Member

Scheduled for Nov 29th from 2:05PM - 4PM PST.

@ronniegeraghty
Copy link
Member

@nathanfalke, please include any materials like package names, champion scenarios, etc. for other programing languages.

@nathanfalke
Copy link
Member Author

We currently only have materials for a Python SDK

@ronniegeraghty
Copy link
Member

@nathanfalke it would be helpful if you could upload the API View links for the python libraries. Thank you.

@nathanfalke
Copy link
Member Author

nathanfalke commented Nov 22, 2022 •
edited
Loading

sure thing

azure-easm
azure-mgmt-easm

given the quick sync, I've regenerated the sdk without models:

azure-easm

@tg-msft
Copy link
Member

tg-msft commented Nov 29, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Recording (MS INTERNAL ONLY)

Approved names:

  • .NET: Azure.Analytics.Defender.Easm
  • Java: com.azure.analytics.defender.easm
  • Python: azure-defender-easm
  • JS/TS: @azure/defender-easm

@nathanfalke nathanfalke mentioned this issue Jan 23, 2023
Merged
6 tasks
@nathanfalke nathanfalke mentioned this issue Feb 3, 2023
Closed
This was referenced Aug 8, 2023
Closed
Closed
Merged
Closed
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft mentioned this issue Sep 14, 2023
Merged
3 tasks
This was referenced Sep 26, 2023
Merged
Merged
jeremymeng pushed a commit to Azure/azure-sdk-for-js that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
@thang-bit
Add defender easm sdk (#27256)
b00a93b 
[product
documentation](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/external-attack-surface-management/)
Azure/azure-sdk#5062
Typespec PR: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#24937
arcboard: Azure/azure-sdk#5062
apiview:
https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/03ef0c5f65374c3789d8302ef5c9c570

### Packages impacted by this PR


### Issues associated with this PR
Azure SDK Review issue:
Azure/azure-sdk-pr#1276
Azure SDK Introducing issue:
Azure/azure-sdk#5062

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR
Adding a new JavaScript data-plane sdk for EASM service

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?


### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_
Yes, test cases are added

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_
- Previous PR: #26755. It
was closed because Shad is no longer working for Microsoft and other
developers don't have access to push to that PR.

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_
Used npx tsp complile to generate the PR
### Checklists
- [ ] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
@thang-bit thang-bit mentioned this issue Feb 29, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ronniegeraghty ronniegeraghty

@kyle-patterson kyle-patterson

Labels
architecture board-review Request for an Architectural Board Review Defender
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@markweitzel @tg-msft @ronniegeraghty @kyle-patterson @nathanfalke