-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #1199 - Simple bugform.js cleanup #1435
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! The only thing we need to do before landing is squash the two commits into one.
You can do that in a number of ways, but the simplest (for me, anyways) is via an interactive rebase:
git rebase -i HEAD~2
Then you want to mark the second commit as the one to be squashed, by changing pick
to s
or squash
:
Save that file, then you need to push back the new, single commit to this PR by doing the following:
git push -f
(let me know if that's confusing, i can also do it for you if you'd prefer!) |
I think I did it successfully. It was confusing at first because the difference between |
Ah, yeah -- depending on the font I bet that could be confusing! I still see 2 commits. Are you sure you pushed the single commit with You can also check by logging out the last 2 commits and making sure yours is only the first one via something like |
That looks about right. For me, my first push typically looks like |
That sounds eminently sensible. I wish I had done that. So, leery of making things worse, I nonetheless tried re-pushing to the correct branch. It looks like there's now only one commit on issues/1199/2, so that seems fixed, but I'm not entirely sure I didn't do something dopey beneath the hood. 🤞🏻 I apologize to be making your job harder! |
Hi, @miketaylr, when you get a chance could you let me know if I managed to send the squashed commits correctly? |
Looks great, there is only one little nag left: The commit message contains the same message ... twice! That's no big deal and we probably could edit that when merging (maybe Mike is doing that), but if you want, you can call Thanks for your patience. I know it can be confusing at first... :) (jumping in since Mike is probably busy with some work traveling) |
Thanks, @denschub and @miketaylr! I amended and pushed again. I appreciate all the hand-holding! 🤓 |
Awesome! Thanks @laghee |
r? @miketaylr