Skip to content

docs: Correction of indentation #216

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ichi075
Copy link

@Ichi075 Ichi075 commented Apr 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved formatting and structure of the tutorial's Table of Contents for better readability.
    • Added a new section on creating a secret for tokens.
    • Standardized section titles for consistency.
    • Corrected indentation in YAML example for clarity.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the structure and formatting of the tutorial's Table of Contents in the documentation. The list style was changed from numbered to bulleted with improved indentation and consistent section titles. A new section, "Create a Secret for Token," was inserted between existing steps. Section headings were reworded for uniformity, and the YAML code snippet's indentation was corrected for clarity. No changes were made to the actual instructional content or code logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
wiki/Tutorial.md Restructured Table of Contents from numbered to bulleted list, added "Create a Secret for Token" section, reworded section titles for consistency, and fixed YAML code indentation.

Poem

In the wiki’s garden, content grew neat,
Bullets replaced numbers—oh, what a treat!
A secret for tokens now hops in between,
Section titles polished, looking pristine.
Indents aligned, the YAML stands tall—
A tidy tutorial, best of them all!
🐇✨

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
wiki/Tutorial.md (1)

6-18: Uniform bullet list indentation and consistency in Table of Contents.

The Table of Contents correctly switches to a bulleted format and adds the new "Create a Secret for Token" entry matching its heading, but nested items use mixed indentation (4 spaces for some, 2 for others), leading to markdownlint MD007 warnings. To improve readability and satisfy linting, please standardize on 2-space indentation for all second‑level bullets.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...orkflow) - Final step - The end # Generate token 1. ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

7-7: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


10-10: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


11-11: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2fa12c and f25bfa8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • wiki/Tutorial.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
wiki/Tutorial.md

[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...orkflow) - Final step - The end # Generate token 1. ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
wiki/Tutorial.md

7-7: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


10-10: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


11-11: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
wiki/Tutorial.md (1)

105-107: YAML code snippet properly nested under jobs.

The build job and its properties are now correctly indented beneath jobs, clarifying the workflow structure. This change aligns with YAML best practices—LGTM!

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
wiki/Tutorial.md (2)

6-18: Improve list indentation consistency in the Table of Contents

The nested items in your TOC (lines 7, 10–11, and similarly under "Create a workflow") use 4 spaces, which triggers markdownlint MD007. It’s best to stick with 2 spaces per indent level for nested bullets. The new "Create a Secret for Token" entry is correctly placed and the anchors match their headings, so semantically you’re good—just adjust the whitespace for linting and readability. For example:

 ### Table of Contents
- [Let's get started!](#lets-get-started)
-     - [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
- [Generate token](#generate-token)
- [Select a repo](#select-a-repo)
-     - [New repo](#new-repo)
-     - [Existing repo](#existing-repo)
+ [Let's get started!](#lets-get-started)
+  - [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
+ [Generate token](#generate-token)
+ [Select a repo](#select-a-repo)
+  - [New repo](#new-repo)
+  - [Existing repo](#existing-repo)
...
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...orkflow) - Final step - The end # Generate token 1. ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

7-7: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


10-10: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


11-11: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


105-109: Standardize YAML indentation for workflow snippet

In the code block under jobs:, the build job and its fields are indented by 4 and 6 spaces. To follow YAML best practices (and align with GitHub Actions docs), use 2 spaces per level:

 jobs:
-    build:
+  build:
-      runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-      name: generate-github-cards
+    name: generate-github-cards
-      permissions:
+    permissions:
-        contents: write
+      contents: write

This ensures clarity and consistency in your examples.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f25bfa8 and 7bb1d85.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • wiki/Tutorial.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
wiki/Tutorial.md

[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...orkflow) - Final step - The end # Generate token 1. ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
wiki/Tutorial.md

7-7: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


10-10: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


11-11: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant