Skip to content

fix: compatibility of fs-extra with esm #4017

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2024
Merged

fix: compatibility of fs-extra with esm #4017

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2024

Conversation

anncwb
Copy link
Collaborator

@anncwb anncwb commented Aug 3, 2024

Description

Fixed the problem where fs-extra reported an error in the window system

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.

Checklist

ℹ️ Check all checkboxes - this will indicate that you have done everything in accordance with the rules in CONTRIBUTING.

  • If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs:dev command.
  • Run the tests with pnpm test.
  • Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new utility functions for handling JSON files and ensuring file existence, enhancing file operation capabilities.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced deployment workflow to update environment variables for multiple applications.
    • Updated code ownership documentation for improved clarity and accountability.
    • Refactored file handling operations to leverage native Node.js modules, improving performance and maintainability.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted file reading operations for better responsiveness and control flow.
  • Style
    • Streamlined code by replacing complex file operations with dedicated utility functions for better readability.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 3, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4a374fb

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 3, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances the clarity of code ownership and refines file handling across the project. Specifically, ownership entries in the .github/CODEOWNERS file have been updated to include email addresses. Additionally, file operations have transitioned to utilize native Node.js modules, improving performance and maintainability. The deployment workflow now accommodates multiple applications, ensuring consistency across configurations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/CODEOWNERS Updated owner entries to use email addresses, enhancing clarity in ownership and communication.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml Enhanced deployment process to update environment variables for multiple applications, ensuring consistent configuration.
internal/node-utils/package.json Removed fs-extra and its type definitions, indicating a shift towards native Node.js modules for file operations.
internal/node-utils/src/fs.ts Introduced utility functions (outputJSON, ensureFile, readJSON) for asynchronous file handling with error logging.
internal/node-utils/src/index.ts Updated exports to utilize native Node.js fs/promises, removing fs-extra. Added export * from './fs' for file utilities.
internal/node-utils/src/prettier.ts Shifted to asynchronous file writing with fs.writeFile, improving non-blocking behavior.
internal/tailwind-config/src/index.ts Removed dependency on @vben/node-utils for filesystem operations, now using native fs.
internal/vite-config/src/plugins/... Replaced asynchronous file reading with synchronous readFileSync, potentially impacting performance.
scripts/vsh/src/code-workspace/... Streamlined JSON output by using outputJSON utility, enhancing readability.
scripts/vsh/src/publint/... Replaced direct fs operations with utility functions (ensureFile, readJSON, outputJSON), improving maintainability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHubActions
    participant NodeUtils

    User->>GitHubActions: Trigger Deployment
    GitHubActions->>NodeUtils: Update Environment Variables
    NodeUtils-->>GitHubActions: Confirm Update
    GitHubActions-->>User: Deployment Complete
Loading

🐰 In the meadow where changes bloom,
A rabbit hops to clear the gloom.
With emails bright for all to see,
Code ownership now flows with glee!
As files dance in native light,
Our project shines, oh what a sight! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf8a5ff and 4a374fb.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (10)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • internal/node-utils/package.json (1 hunks)
  • internal/node-utils/src/fs.ts (1 hunks)
  • internal/node-utils/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • internal/node-utils/src/prettier.ts (2 hunks)
  • internal/tailwind-config/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • internal/vite-config/src/plugins/inject-app-loading/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • scripts/vsh/src/code-workspace/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • scripts/vsh/src/publint/index.ts (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
  • internal/node-utils/package.json
Additional comments not posted (14)
internal/node-utils/src/prettier.ts (2)

1-1: LGTM! The import statement change aligns with best practices.

The shift to node:fs/promises for asynchronous file operations is appropriate.


16-16: LGTM! The function changes align with best practices.

The shift to asynchronous file operations improves performance and non-blocking behavior.

internal/node-utils/src/index.ts (3)

3-3: LGTM! The export statement change aligns with the new file structure.

The addition of export * from './fs'; ensures that file system utilities are exposed correctly.


18-18: LGTM! The export statement change aligns with best practices.

The shift to node:fs/promises for asynchronous file operations is appropriate.


20-20: LGTM! The export statement retention ensures existing functionality is maintained.

The retention of export { type PackageJson, readPackageJSON } from 'pkg-types'; ensures that package JSON handling remains available.

internal/node-utils/src/fs.ts (3)

1-19: LGTM! The function outputJSON is well-implemented.

The function correctly writes JSON data to a file asynchronously, with proper error handling and logging.


21-31: LGTM! The function ensureFile is well-implemented.

The function correctly ensures that a file exists, with proper error handling and logging.


33-41: LGTM! The function readJSON is well-implemented.

The function correctly reads JSON data from a file asynchronously, with proper error handling and logging.

scripts/vsh/src/code-workspace/index.ts (1)

11-11: LGTM! Verify the implementation of outputJSON in @vben/node-utils.

The change to use outputJSON from @vben/node-utils is approved.

However, ensure that outputJSON is correctly implemented in @vben/node-utils.

Verification successful

Verified: The implementation of outputJSON in @vben/node-utils is correct.

  • The function outputJSON is defined in internal/node-utils/src/fs.ts.
  • It creates the directory if it doesn't exist, stringifies the data with a specified number of spaces, writes the JSON data to the file, and logs a message.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `outputJSON` in `@vben/node-utils`.

# Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: Correct implementation of `outputJSON`.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'export function outputJSON'

Length of output: 91


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `outputJSON` in `@vben/node-utils`.

# Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: Correct implementation of `outputJSON`.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function outputJSON($_, $_) { $$$ }'

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `outputJSON` in `@vben/node-utils`.

# Test: Search for any function named `outputJSON`. Expect: Correct implementation of `outputJSON`.
rg 'function outputJSON' --glob '*.ts' -A 10

Length of output: 720

internal/vite-config/src/plugins/inject-app-loading/index.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM!

The change to import the fs module from node:fs is approved.

.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

29-34: LGTM!

The changes to include updates for web-ele and web-naive applications in the deployment process are approved.

scripts/vsh/src/publint/index.ts (2)

61-62: LGTM! Improved readability and error handling.

The use of ensureFile and readJSON from @vben/node-utils improves the readability and error handling of the readCache function.


78-78: LGTM! Consistent use of utility functions.

The use of readJSON and outputJSON from @vben/node-utils aligns the code with the new utility function approach, improving consistency.

Also applies to: 111-111

internal/tailwind-config/src/index.ts (1)

3-3: LGTM! Improved clarity and performance.

The shift towards using the native fs module instead of @vben/node-utils for filesystem operations can improve performance and clarity.

Also applies to: 6-6

@anncwb anncwb merged commit 27ffc9e into main Aug 3, 2024
11 checks passed
@anncwb anncwb deleted the fixture/fs branch August 3, 2024 01:50
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 5, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant