Skip to content

docs: Improve Getting Started #2820

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DevTKSS
Copy link

@DevTKSS DevTKSS commented Jun 18, 2025

GitHub Issue (If applicable): closes #

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Documentation content changes

What is the current behavior?

  • Note about "Uno Check found problems" missing
  • MainWindow and Host Property ordering of advises to change them is a bit confusing in this order, as the whole app is building on top of them.
  • As the extension docs are expandable in volume, there has been missing a proper overview of the App.xaml.cs contents
  • Only Frame Navigation Set-Up was mentioned in the code. As these Getting Started belongs to the uno.extensions, there should at least be that start point from the App.xaml.cs to frame AND Navigation Extension.

What is the new behavior?

  • Added Information about Uno Check found problems Banner
  • Improved the ordering for Window and Hostbuilder, to build the app step by step and not from end to beginning -> makes it easier to follow the guide
  • Added Diff including comments to difference between, what belongs to which feature and at which level in which order we need to put them, when we do not want to create a app to just see where to do this, when we might be migrating or adding from a blank preset app.
  • Added short information, how in exchange the Navigation Extension would be used with Builder.

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Docs have been added/updated which fit documentation template. (for bug fixes / features)
  • Contains NO breaking changes
  • Associated with an issue (GitHub or internal)

Other information

Internal Issue (If applicable):

@unodevops
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️⚠️ The build 168775 has failed on uno.extensions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants