Skip to content

Remove unused broken clone function #148

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2024

Conversation

glandium
Copy link
Contributor

The base class doesn't have a clone member function, so the code was never valid. As it was unused, that didn't cause problems until clang caught this earlier than instantiation in
llvm/llvm-project#84050

The base class doesn't have a clone member function, so the code was
never valid. As it was unused, that didn't cause problems until clang
caught this earlier than instantiation in
llvm/llvm-project#84050
@tpoechtrager tpoechtrager merged commit 856d7d1 into tpoechtrager:1009.2-ld64-907 Apr 26, 2024
moz-v2v-gh pushed a commit to mozilla/gecko-dev that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
…-system-reviewers,sergesanspaille,nalexander

The base class doesn't have a clone member function, so the code was
never valid. As it was unused, that didn't cause problems until clang
caught this earlier than instantiation in
llvm/llvm-project#84050

Submitted upstream as tpoechtrager/cctools-port#148

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D208688
i3roly pushed a commit to i3roly/firefox-dynasty that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2024
…-system-reviewers,sergesanspaille,nalexander

The base class doesn't have a clone member function, so the code was
never valid. As it was unused, that didn't cause problems until clang
caught this earlier than instantiation in
llvm/llvm-project#84050

Submitted upstream as tpoechtrager/cctools-port#148

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D208688
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants