-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Use codeinclude for Elasticsearch Module #2828
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e12fe56
Use codeinclude #1158
raynigon b7ab51f
implement review comments
raynigon 27a7130
merge documentation to container tests #1158
raynigon 6c6c0d2
always use the current version of elasticsearch
raynigon 70cbfb8
update codeinclude naming
raynigon cf2bf3c
remove asserts from documentation
raynigon 98a0752
Merge branch 'master' into master
raynigon 3305bec
Merge branch 'master' into master
raynigon cbee344
Merge branch 'master' into master
raynigon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably omit these assertions from the docs...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it possible to exclude lines from a code block with the codeinclude macro?
This would be really helpful feature to decrease the amount of new code in the tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not directly to exclude, but you can use the same block ID more than once and every block should be included. e.g. given:
When rendered via codeinclude, it should appear like:
I'm partly tempted to add explicit excludes support to the codeinclude macro, but I think I'd prefer to try the above approach first.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks that is exactly what i need
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This leads to a wrong indentation:

There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR could help to solve the problem: rnorth/mkdocs-codeinclude-plugin#14
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've been trying to untangle the PRs on the codeinclude plugin, because I think you're right. Unfortunately they're not independent, and that PR is built upon other PRs that have issues.
I think it'll be a bit of time before that gets merged.
Shall we just go ahead and merge? The indentation issue should get sorted out separately later 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sounds like a plan :)