-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
fix(core): use Headers
in sendIpcMessage
#13227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
lucasfernog
merged 6 commits into
tauri-apps:dev
from
Legend-Master:use-headers-in-send-ipc-message
Apr 14, 2025
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c854a0d
Use `Headers` in `sendIpcMessage`
Legend-Master 857e50f
Add change file
Legend-Master 3913be8
Change files
Legend-Master 70ebd74
Don't use optional chaining
Legend-Master cc38360
do not let the tauri headers to be overwritten
lucasfernog 8448fd2
use HeadersInit on the type definition
lucasfernog File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
"tauri": patch:bug | ||
--- | ||
|
||
`invoke` will now properly throw when `options.headers` contains non-ascii characters instead of silently replacing them |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
"tauri": patch:bug | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Fix `invoke` ignores the headers option if it's an `Headers` |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm just a bit curious, why not implement it this way? It seems more elegant.
I guess it's to preserve previous behavior (allowing users to override preset headers)? But overriding these headers seems like an unreasonable behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's the reason why I did it like this
That's true though
I'm not entirely sure if it's supposed to be able to override these or not, cc @lucasfernog
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
welllll nice catch.. that's used internally so we shouldn't allow them to be overwritten (it would break the IPC if you did so - never running or responding depending on which value you change)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Legend-Master can you take his suggestion and change
new Headers(options?.headers)
tonew Headers((options && options.headers) || {})
(null cannot be used in that constructor)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pushed :)