Skip to content

testcase for bgp container in container hardening #8694

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 21, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions tests/container_hardening/test_container_hardening.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
import pytest
import logging
from tests.common.helpers.assertions import pytest_assert

pytestmark = [
pytest.mark.topology('any'),
]

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)


def test_bgp_dev(duthost):
"""
Test bgp container has no access to /dev/vda* or /dev/sda*
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this test related to the --privileged flag removal or net=host?
I think we should mention this and also change the name of the test to accommodate it.
Also - in the future, I think we should make this test generic for any container that wants to test their solution.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Yarden-Z it's related to test --privileged flag, I modified the test to make it generic.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a good improvement.
I think that in the future we can make this test even more generic.
i.e - maintain a list of containers that do not have the --privileged flag. (define this list in some global or maintain it in the section of container hardening)
Then - for each container (name) in this list, iterate on top of them and execute this test. That way - we won't need the if case and we'll be able to scale this test for each new container.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addressed your comment, thanks

"""
device = duthost.shell("docker exec bgp bash -c 'df -h | grep /etc/hosts' | awk '{print $1}'")['stdout']
Copy link
Contributor

@qiluo-msft qiluo-msft Jun 26, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

device

Will you check shell return code, and device is a valid path? If not, there may be risk to be inject into another command. #Closed

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked return code and valid path for device

output = duthost.shell("docker exec bgp bash -c 'ls {}'".format(device), module_ignore_errors=True)['stdout']
pytest_assert(not output, 'The partition {} exists.'.format(device))
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions tests/python3_test_files.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ console/test_console_loopback.py
console/test_console_reversessh.py
console/test_console_udevrule.py
container_checker/test_container_checker.py
container_hardening/test_container_hardening.py
copp/test_copp.py
crm/test_crm.py
dash/test_dash_vnet.py
Expand Down