Skip to content

Add database as snmp/lldp container's mount_from, so possible to connect redis by unix socket #126

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2017

Conversation

qiluo-msft
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@stcheng stcheng merged commit bd503c2 into sonic-net:master Feb 16, 2017
@qiluo-msft qiluo-msft deleted the qiluo/python-unixsocket branch February 17, 2017 00:38
yxieca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
What is the motivation for this PR?
The new test is a poorly written IPV6 variant of testQosSaiDscpQueueMapping. It is expected to fail across all platforms/topolgies because qos/test_qos_sai.py cannot support IPV6 variant of any of it's testcase because IPV6 is disabled on the DUT by qos_sai_base.py: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/blob/master/tests/qos/qos_sai_base.py#L1811-L1826 Also the changes made for this test touch class scoped fixtures which causes all the other testcases to error out as well.

How did you do it?
Revert #10941 as well as the following fixes that were made to get around the issue

Fix qos/test_qos_sai.py #12334
Skip IPV6 variant of testQosSaiDscpQueueMapping if IPV6 is not config… #12834

How did you verify/test it?
Verfied on T0, T1 and T0-dualTor, #126 was not seen.
nhe-NV pushed a commit to nhe-NV/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
…net#126)

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
For testbed with multi-servers (HLD: sonic-net#15395
We need to make sure ptf data plane connectivity.
In this PR, we make sure ptf data plane works when running tests.
### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] Test case(new/improvement)

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
We need to make sure ptf data plane connectivity during tests running.
#### How did you do it?
Start ptf_nn_agent on every ptf container and connect them with ptf dataplane.
#### How did you verify/test it?
Run test case with ptf dataplane on single server testbed and multi-servers testbed.
#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants