[docker-frr]: change default routing mode to separated and fix a bug … #2961
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…in separated mode In separated mode, frr requires to run vtysh_b to load individual configuration Signed-off-by: Guohan Lu <[email protected]>
pavel-shirshov
approved these changes
May 31, 2019
vaibhavhd
added a commit
to sonic-net/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2023
…om minigraph parser (#2890) MSFT ADO: 24419953 This is to fix a bug where warm upgrade from old image (eg. 20181130) to new image (eg. 202012) does not update docker_routing_config_mode to the new config expected the target OS. For eg., in 201811 DEVICE_METADATA.localhost.docker_routing_config_mode is set to unified. After upgrade to 202012 the value is not changed. However, the expectation in newer images is that the value is separated. The move from unified to separated was done as part of an old change: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#2961 However, migration logic was not updated since then. Because of this miss, cross-branch warm-upgrade from 201811 to 2020212 to 202305 to latest will always keep the setting as unified. How I did it Added a common migration logic: update docker_routing_config_mode to the value from minigraph parser. How to verify it Added a new unit test. Updated old unit tests.
StormLiangMS
pushed a commit
to sonic-net/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2023
…om minigraph parser (#2890) MSFT ADO: 24419953 This is to fix a bug where warm upgrade from old image (eg. 20181130) to new image (eg. 202012) does not update docker_routing_config_mode to the new config expected the target OS. For eg., in 201811 DEVICE_METADATA.localhost.docker_routing_config_mode is set to unified. After upgrade to 202012 the value is not changed. However, the expectation in newer images is that the value is separated. The move from unified to separated was done as part of an old change: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#2961 However, migration logic was not updated since then. Because of this miss, cross-branch warm-upgrade from 201811 to 2020212 to 202305 to latest will always keep the setting as unified. How I did it Added a common migration logic: update docker_routing_config_mode to the value from minigraph parser. How to verify it Added a new unit test. Updated old unit tests.
vaibhavhd
added a commit
to vaibhavhd/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2023
…om minigraph parser (sonic-net#2890) MSFT ADO: 24419953 This is to fix a bug where warm upgrade from old image (eg. 20181130) to new image (eg. 202012) does not update docker_routing_config_mode to the new config expected the target OS. For eg., in 201811 DEVICE_METADATA.localhost.docker_routing_config_mode is set to unified. After upgrade to 202012 the value is not changed. However, the expectation in newer images is that the value is separated. The move from unified to separated was done as part of an old change: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#2961 However, migration logic was not updated since then. Because of this miss, cross-branch warm-upgrade from 201811 to 2020212 to 202305 to latest will always keep the setting as unified. How I did it Added a common migration logic: update docker_routing_config_mode to the value from minigraph parser. How to verify it Added a new unit test. Updated old unit tests.
vaibhavhd
added a commit
to vaibhavhd/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2023
…om minigraph parser (sonic-net#2890) MSFT ADO: 24419953 This is to fix a bug where warm upgrade from old image (eg. 20181130) to new image (eg. 202012) does not update docker_routing_config_mode to the new config expected the target OS. For eg., in 201811 DEVICE_METADATA.localhost.docker_routing_config_mode is set to unified. After upgrade to 202012 the value is not changed. However, the expectation in newer images is that the value is separated. The move from unified to separated was done as part of an old change: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#2961 However, migration logic was not updated since then. Because of this miss, cross-branch warm-upgrade from 201811 to 2020212 to 202305 to latest will always keep the setting as unified. How I did it Added a common migration logic: update docker_routing_config_mode to the value from minigraph parser. How to verify it Added a new unit test. Updated old unit tests.
rajkumar38
pushed a commit
to rajkumar38/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2023
…om minigraph parser (sonic-net#2890) MSFT ADO: 24419953 This is to fix a bug where warm upgrade from old image (eg. 20181130) to new image (eg. 202012) does not update docker_routing_config_mode to the new config expected the target OS. For eg., in 201811 DEVICE_METADATA.localhost.docker_routing_config_mode is set to unified. After upgrade to 202012 the value is not changed. However, the expectation in newer images is that the value is separated. The move from unified to separated was done as part of an old change: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#2961 However, migration logic was not updated since then. Because of this miss, cross-branch warm-upgrade from 201811 to 2020212 to 202305 to latest will always keep the setting as unified. How I did it Added a common migration logic: update docker_routing_config_mode to the value from minigraph parser. How to verify it Added a new unit test. Updated old unit tests.
yxieca
pushed a commit
to sonic-net/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2023
…om minigraph parser (#2890) (#2922) MSFT ADO: 24419953 This is to fix a bug where warm upgrade from old image (eg. 20181130) to new image (eg. 202012) does not update docker_routing_config_mode to the new config expected the target OS. For eg., in 201811 DEVICE_METADATA.localhost.docker_routing_config_mode is set to unified. After upgrade to 202012 the value is not changed. However, the expectation in newer images is that the value is separated. The move from unified to separated was done as part of an old change: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#2961 However, migration logic was not updated since then. Because of this miss, cross-branch warm-upgrade from 201811 to 2020212 to 202305 to latest will always keep the setting as unified. How I did it Added a common migration logic: update docker_routing_config_mode to the value from minigraph parser. How to verify it Added a new unit test. Updated old unit tests.
pdhruv-marvell
pushed a commit
to pdhruv-marvell/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2023
…om minigraph parser (sonic-net#2890) MSFT ADO: 24419953 This is to fix a bug where warm upgrade from old image (eg. 20181130) to new image (eg. 202012) does not update docker_routing_config_mode to the new config expected the target OS. For eg., in 201811 DEVICE_METADATA.localhost.docker_routing_config_mode is set to unified. After upgrade to 202012 the value is not changed. However, the expectation in newer images is that the value is separated. The move from unified to separated was done as part of an old change: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#2961 However, migration logic was not updated since then. Because of this miss, cross-branch warm-upgrade from 201811 to 2020212 to 202305 to latest will always keep the setting as unified. How I did it Added a common migration logic: update docker_routing_config_mode to the value from minigraph parser. How to verify it Added a new unit test. Updated old unit tests.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…in separated mode
In separated mode, frr requires to run vtysh_b to load individual configuration
Signed-off-by: Guohan Lu [email protected]
- What I did
- How I did it
- How to verify it
tested on virtual switch.
- Description for the changelog
- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)