-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Get port alias but not port name in snmp_interface test #990
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@qiluo-msft do we expect the alias or the interface name in the snmp test? |
I think alias. |
then the snmp behavior is correct, it is the test issue that fails this task. |
Hi all, Thank you for the info for this behavior. ARISTA01T1#sh lldp neighbors Port Neighbor Device ID Neighbor Port ID TTL Is that also expected, too? Regards, |
Yes. alias is also expected in lldp test. |
Thank you guys. |
* src/sonic-swss 63afbd5...5be3963 (11): > Remove the platform check for remove/add port action at init phase. (sonic-net#1006) > [test]: Add Class object in each test script file (sonic-net#992) > [vstest]: add --imgname option to specify vs image to test (sonic-net#996) > [qosorch]: Add cir and pir parameters for scheduler (sonic-net#991) > [vstest]: report error when team kernel module is not available (sonic-net#994) > Support per buffer pool watermark polling mode (sonic-net#973) > [test]: Update test_vlan to use dvs functions (sonic-net#986) > Add synchronous switch to orch agent (sonic-net#987) > ARM32 bit fixes, for 64bit printf format specifier (sonic-net#989) > [portsorch]: Rename function isPortReady() to allPortsReady() (sonic-net#990) > [routeorch]: Fix observer detaching procedure for next hop observers (sonic-net#985) Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu <[email protected]>
… platform (#3240) * Utilize the same sai.profile and config.bcm file Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu <[email protected]> * Fix the index issues for HWSKU: Seastone-DX010-25-50 and Seastone-DX010-50-40 Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu <[email protected]> * Update sonic-swss submodule * src/sonic-swss 63afbd5...5be3963 (11): > Remove the platform check for remove/add port action at init phase. (#1006) > [test]: Add Class object in each test script file (#992) > [vstest]: add --imgname option to specify vs image to test (#996) > [qosorch]: Add cir and pir parameters for scheduler (#991) > [vstest]: report error when team kernel module is not available (#994) > Support per buffer pool watermark polling mode (#973) > [test]: Update test_vlan to use dvs functions (#986) > Add synchronous switch to orch agent (#987) > ARM32 bit fixes, for 64bit printf format specifier (#989) > [portsorch]: Rename function isPortReady() to allPortsReady() (#990) > [routeorch]: Fix observer detaching procedure for next hop observers (#985) Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu <[email protected]>
…net#990) Signed-off-by: Wenda Ni <[email protected]>
…omatically (#21989) #### Why I did it src/sonic-swss-common ``` * c82811f - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Added Icmp Echo session table names (#980) (3 hours ago) [manamand2020] * 38da2cc - Merge pull request #990 from xwjiang-ms/update_start_sh (4 days ago) [xwjiang-ms] |\ | failure_prs.log 03ae013 - update start.sh for new sonic-swss soft bfd tests (4 days ago) [xiaweijiang] |/ * dce55c3 - add DASH_HA_SET_TABLE and DASH_HA_SCOPE_TABLE #985 (11 days ago) [Jing Zhang] ``` #### How I did it #### How to verify it #### Description for the changelog
…omatically (sonic-net#21989) #### Why I did it src/sonic-swss-common ``` * c82811f - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Added Icmp Echo session table names (sonic-net#980) (3 hours ago) [manamand2020] * 38da2cc - Merge pull request sonic-net#990 from xwjiang-ms/update_start_sh (4 days ago) [xwjiang-ms] |\ | failure_prs.log 03ae013 - update start.sh for new sonic-swss soft bfd tests (4 days ago) [xiaweijiang] |/ * dce55c3 - add DASH_HA_SET_TABLE and DASH_HA_SCOPE_TABLE sonic-net#985 (11 days ago) [Jing Zhang] ``` #### How I did it #### How to verify it #### Description for the changelog
…faults_objects.j2 (sonic-net#990) <!-- Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines: https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md failure_prs.log skip_prs.log Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` ** If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx" Please provide the following information: --> #### Why I did it To have buffers updated to new requirements to following SKUs: Mellanox-SN5600-C256S1 Mellanox-SN5600-C224O8 Mellanox-SN5610N-C256S2 Mellanox-SN5610N-C224O8 Mellanox-SN5640-C512S2 Mellanox-SN5600-C448O16 sonic-mgmt test update: sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#17788 ##### Work item tracking - Microsoft ADO **(number only)**: #### How I did it Set port.alpha to 1/64. Set queue.alpha for queues 1, 2, and 3 to 1. Set queue.alpha for queue 4 to infinity or 128 #### How to verify it Load an image with the change on Mellanox system, check SDK dumps and run sonic-mgmt test. <!-- If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012. --> #### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected) <!-- - Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features! - Please also provide a reason for the backporting below. - e.g. - [x] 202006 --> - [ ] 201811 - [ ] 201911 - [ ] 202006 - [ ] 202012 - [ ] 202106 - [ ] 202111 - [ ] 202205 - [ ] 202211 - [ ] 202305 #### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version) <!-- - Please provide tested image version - e.g. - [x] 20201231.100 --> - [ ] <!-- image version 1 --> - [ ] <!-- image version 2 --> #### Description for the changelog <!-- Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this pull request for inclusion in the changelog: --> <!-- Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU. --> #### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes <!-- Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model is defined Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md --> #### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
Description
Expect get port name but get port alias in snmp_interface test
Steps to reproduce the issue:
Describe the results you received:
"snmp_intf": [
"Ethernet20/1",
"Ethernet16/1",
"Ethernet30/1",
"Ethernet23/1",
"Ethernet19/1",
"Ethernet17/1",
"Ethernet29/1",
"Ethernet18/1",
"Ethernet24/1",
"Ethernet21/1",
"Ethernet14/1",
"Ethernet32/1",
"Ethernet22/1",
"Ethernet7/1",
"Ethernet4/1",
"Ethernet26/1",
"Ethernet6/1",
"Ethernet13/1",
"Ethernet9/1",
"Ethernet15/1",
"Ethernet12/1",
"Ethernet10/1",
"Ethernet8/1",
"Ethernet31/1",
"Ethernet11/1",
"Ethernet1/1",
"Ethernet28/1",
"Ethernet2/1",
"Ethernet25/1",
"Ethernet3/1",
"Ethernet27/1",
"Ethernet5/1",
]
Describe the results you expected:
"minigraph_map_sonic_to_ngs": {
"Ethernet0": "Ethernet0",
"Ethernet100": "Ethernet100",
"Ethernet104": "Ethernet104",
"Ethernet108": "Ethernet108",
"Ethernet112": "Ethernet112",
"Ethernet116": "Ethernet116",
"Ethernet12": "Ethernet12",
"Ethernet120": "Ethernet120",
"Ethernet124": "Ethernet124",
"Ethernet16": "Ethernet16",
"Ethernet20": "Ethernet20",
"Ethernet24": "Ethernet24",
"Ethernet28": "Ethernet28",
"Ethernet32": "Ethernet32",
"Ethernet36": "Ethernet36",
"Ethernet4": "Ethernet4",
"Ethernet40": "Ethernet40",
"Ethernet44": "Ethernet44",
"Ethernet48": "Ethernet48",
"Ethernet52": "Ethernet52",
"Ethernet56": "Ethernet56",
"Ethernet60": "Ethernet60",
"Ethernet64": "Ethernet64",
"Ethernet68": "Ethernet68",
"Ethernet72": "Ethernet72",
"Ethernet76": "Ethernet76",
"Ethernet8": "Ethernet8",
"Ethernet80": "Ethernet80",
"Ethernet84": "Ethernet84",
"Ethernet88": "Ethernet88",
"Ethernet92": "Ethernet92",
"Ethernet96": "Ethernet96"
}
Additional information you deem important (e.g. issue happens only occasionally):
I'm using version 201709 in my box to run the test, not sure this is expected result at this version or not since I can pass this test at version 201705.
Any comment are welcome, thanks.
Regards,
Kenie Liu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: