-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
DHCP DOS Mitigation HLD in SONiC #1651
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 9 commits
40b8ecf
7f98530
66d625f
d9b31ca
a638d04
41fa4ea
2af94af
4ea86e1
1e3a3d4
654fdf1
d813229
62aa406
b7f2618
ea15a9f
a69db95
1c68d9a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ | ||
# DHCP DoS Mitigation in SONiC # | ||
|
||
[© xFlow Research Inc](https://xflowresearch.com/) | ||
|
||
## Revision History | ||
|
||
|Revision No. | Change Description | Author | Date | | ||
|--------------|--------------------|-------------------------------|----------------| | ||
| 0.1 | Initial Version | Muhammad Ali Hussnain, Asad Raza | 11 April 2024 | | ||
|
||
|
||
## Table of Content | ||
|
||
|
||
- [Scope](#scope) | ||
- [Definitions/Abbreviations](#definitionsabbreviations) | ||
- [Introduction](#introduction) | ||
- [DHCP DoS Attack](##dhcp-dos-attack) | ||
- [DHCP Starvation Attack](##dhcp-starvation-attack) | ||
|
||
- [Effects of DHCP DoS Attacks](#effects-of-dhcp-dos-attacks) | ||
- [Behavior of DHCP DoS Attack](#behavior-of-dhcp-dos-attack) | ||
- [DHCP DoS Mitigation](#dhcp-dos-mitigation) | ||
- [Proposed Solution](#proposed-solution) | ||
|
||
- [Requirements](#requirements) | ||
- [Architecture Design](#architecture-design) | ||
- [Sequence Diagram to Add Rate-limit](#sequence-diagram-to-add-rate-limit) | ||
- [Sequence Diagram to Delete Rate-limit](#sequence-diagram-to-del-rate-limit) | ||
- [SAI API](#sai-api) | ||
- [CLI/YANG model Enhancements](#cli/yang-model-enhancements) | ||
- [CLI Configuration Commands](#cli-configuration-commands) | ||
- [YANG Model](#yang-model) | ||
- [Testing Requirements](#testing-requirementsdesign) | ||
- [Unit Test Cases](#unit-test-cases) | ||
- [Warm Boot and Fastboot Design Impact](#warmboot-and-fastboot-design-impact) | ||
- [Future Work](#future-work) | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
### Scope | ||
|
||
This high-level design document describes the implementation for mitigation of DHCP DoS attacks in SONiC | ||
|
||
### Definitions/Abbreviations | ||
|
||
| Sr No | Term | Definition | | ||
|-------|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | ||
| 1 | DHCP | Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol | | ||
| 2 | DoS | Denial of Service | | ||
| 3 | DORA | DISCOVER, OFFER, REQUEST, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | | ||
| 4 | TC | Traffic Control | | ||
|
||
### Introduction | ||
DHCP DoS attack mitigation aims to safeguard the network infrastructure by implementing a rate-limiting mechanism to mitigate the impact of DHCP Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. | ||
|
||
There are two main types of DHCP attacks: | ||
- DHCP DoS (Denial of Service) - Focus of this HLD | ||
- DHCP Starvation | ||
|
||
#### DHCP DoS (Denial of Service) Attack | ||
|
||
In a DHCP DoS (Denial of Service) attack, an attacker floods the DHCP server with an overwhelming number of DHCP DISCOVER packets. This flood of DISCOVER packets consumes all available resources on the DHCP server, making it unable to respond to legitimate DHCP requests from other devices. This proposal focuses on DHCP DoS mitigation. | ||
|
||
#### DHCP Starvation Attack | ||
|
||
In a DHCP starvation attack, the attacker floods the DHCP server with a large number of DHCP request messages and accepts the DHCP server’s offers, exhausting the pool of available IP addresses that the DHCP server can assign. As a result, legitimate devices are unable to obtain IP addresses from the DHCP server, causing network connectivity issues for those devices. DHCP Starvation mitigation is out of scope of this HLD. | ||
|
||
### Effects of DHCP DoS Attacks | ||
|
||
|
||
A switch forwards DHCP messages between clients and servers. A flood of DHCP DISCOVER packets affects the DHCP server. With a large number of DHCP DISCOVER packets the server becomes overwhelmed, leading to the following issues: | ||
|
||
- #### Resource Exhaustion | ||
The DHCP server has finite resources such as CPU, memory, and network bandwidth. A flood of DHCP discover packets consumes these resources, causing the server to become overloaded and unable to process legitimate DHCP requests on the attacker VLAN effectively. | ||
|
||
- #### Service Degradation | ||
The flood of DHCP discover packets causes service degradation for other clients served by the DHCP server. Legitimate DHCP requests experience delays or timeouts as the server struggles to handle the excessive volume of traffic on the attacker VLAN. | ||
|
||
- #### Packet Loss | ||
The DHCP server experiences packet loss due to the overwhelming volume of DHCP DISCOVER packets. This can result in dropped DHCP requests from legitimate clients on the attacker VLAN, leading to connectivity issues and network downtime. | ||
|
||
- #### Impact on Network Performance | ||
The flood of DHCP DISCOVER packets impacts the performance of the network infrastructure, including switches, routers, and other devices involved in forwarding DHCP traffic. Congestion caused by the flood can degrade overall network performance and affect the operation of other network services. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Behavior of DHCP DoS Attack | ||
|
||
|
||
<figure style="text-align:center;"> | ||
<img src="../../images/dhcp_mitigation_hld/TOPOLOGY_DIA.drawio.png" width="60%" alt="DHCP DoS Attack Topology Diagram"/> | ||
<figcaption>Figure 1: DHCP DoS attack topology diagram</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The above figure shows 2 different VLANs configured with 3 hosts and a DHCP server. Attacker and PC-1 are in Vlan-20 and DHCP-SERVER and PC-2 reside in Vlan-10. | ||
|
||
As shown in the diagram, the attacker launches an attack on the DHCP server with a flood of DHCP DISCOVER packets. The attacker generates a large number of DHCP DISCOVER packets with spoofed MAC addresses and sends these packets to the switch. The switch forwards these packets to the DHCP server. The attack is shown in the following diagram . | ||
|
||
|
||
<figure style="text-align:center;"> | ||
<img src="../../images/dhcp_mitigation_hld/Discover.png" width="80%" alt="Image captured from wireshark during instance of attack"/> | ||
<figcaption>Figure 2: Image captured from wireshark during instance of attack</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Due to the huge number of DHCP DISCOVER packets, the server is busy processing the DHCP DISCOVER packets and is unable to respond to other clients on the same VLAN as the attacker. This demonstrates a successful DoS attack which overwhelms the DHCP server. | ||
|
||
It can be seen in the screenshot below that a legitimate client (PC-1) is unable to be serviced by the DHCP server. After the continuous bombardment of DHCP DISCOVER packets, the DORA process fails to complete, indicating a potential Denial of Service (DoS) situation. | ||
|
||
|
||
<figure style="text-align:center;"> | ||
<img src="../../images/dhcp_mitigation_hld/DORA.png" width="60%" alt="Incomplete DORA process during DoS attack"/> | ||
<figcaption>Figure 3: Incomplete DORA process during DoS attack</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | ||
|
||
### DHCP DoS Mitigation | ||
|
||
|
||
To prevent possible DHCP DoS attacks in SONiC, we suggest using rate-limiting with Linux Traffic Control (TC). | ||
|
||
SONiC has Traffic Control Utility available. This is used for handling data movement through the network. | ||
By setting limits on the number of DHCP requests that can be forwarded, we can protect against attacks. This helps keep the network running smoothly and securely. | ||
Following are some use cases of Traffic Control : | ||
- It can filter packets on the basis of their properties (eg. IP protocols, source/destination ports and IP addresses, etc.) and drop them based on their behavior (ingress, egress, rate, etc.) | ||
- It can also change or modify the data if needed. | ||
|
||
Traffic control(TC) uses queuing disciplines (qdiscs) to help organize and manage the transmission of traffic through a network interface. A qdisc performs two main functions: | ||
- Enqueuing requests to place packets in a queue for later transmission | ||
- Dequeuing requests to select a packet from the queue for immediate transmission | ||
|
||
To prevent a potential DHCP DoS attack on an interface, incoming traffic at the interface is rate-limited using traffic control(TC). | ||
|
||
#### Proposed Solution | ||
|
||
DHCP traffic can be filtered and rate-limited by dropping all packets that exceed a user-specified rate, allowing legitimate users to be serviced by the DHCP server despite an ongoing attack. The design provides a mechanism for DHCP rate-limiting on a specified interface. Applying a DHCP rate-limit on a specific interface requires two parameters: | ||
|
||
- ##### Interface | ||
The interface on which the DHCP rate limit is to be applied | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Incoming dropped packets are logged in the ipfilter log? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hi @Yarden-Z , No, Incoming dropped packets are not logged in the ipfilter log for Linux systems. iptables can do the task but then we have to mark those packets with traffic control utility and then using iptables we can log about those marked packets " drop by tc" . but tc does not have the ability to log. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Then if this occurrence happens - how is the user notified of this? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. User can be notifiy via show command. In the show command, user can see the number of dropped packets on a specific interface. |
||
|
||
- ##### rate (packets per second) | ||
An integer specifying a DHCP packet rate in packets per second - since traffic control(TC) only supports rates in the form of bytes per second, this value is multiplied by 406 (number of bytes that make up a DHCP discover packet) | ||
|
||
Upon running this command, an ingress queuing discipline is created on the specified interface via traffic control(TC). Next, a traffic control(TC) filter is added to filter DHCP discover packets on protocol 17 (UDP) and destination port 67 (port used by DHCP), and a dropping action is applied to the filtered incoming traffic. Incoming DHCP discover packets that exceed the rate are dropped to stop the attack from overwhelming the DHCP server. | ||
|
||
### Requirements | ||
|
||
- Support for Linux traffic control (tc) for implementing the rate-limiting mechanism | ||
- Support for CLI commands for configuring DHCP rate-limiting | ||
|
||
### Architecture Design | ||
The overall SONiC architecture will remain the same and no new sub-modules will be introduced. Changes are made only in SONiC CLI where rate-limiting commands will be added that employ the Linux traffic control utility. | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
### Sequence Diagram to Add Rate-limit | ||
|
||
<figure style="text-align:center;"> | ||
<img src="../../images/dhcp_mitigation_hld/add-seq2.drawio.png" width="80%"/> | ||
<figcaption>Figure 4: Sequence diagram illustrating the process of adding rate-limit for DHCP DoS mitigation</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | ||
|
||
|
||
### Sequence Diagram to Del rate-limit | ||
|
||
<figure style="text-align:center;"> | ||
<img src="../../images/dhcp_mitigation_hld/Delete.drawio.png" width="80%"/> | ||
<figcaption>Figure 5: Sequence diagram illustrating the process of deleting rate-limit for DHCP DoS mitigation</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | ||
|
||
|
||
### SAI API | ||
|
||
No SAI API change or addition is needed for this HLD. | ||
|
||
|
||
### CLI/YANG model Enhancements | ||
|
||
##### CLI Configuration Commands | ||
|
||
Proposed SONiC CLI commands (sonic-utilities) | ||
- config interface dhcp-mitigation-rate add [interface] [packet-rate] | ||
- config interface dhcp-mitigation-rate delete [interface] [packet-rate] | ||
- show interface dhcp-mitigation-rate | ||
|
||
Background Linux TC commands | ||
- sudo tc qdisc add dev [interface] handle ffff: ingress | ||
- sudo tc filter add dev [interface] protocol ip parent ffff: prio 1 u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip dport 67 0xffff police rate [byte-rate] burst [byte-rate] conform-exceed drop | ||
|
||
|
||
##### YANG Model | ||
No new YANG Model proposed for this HLD. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Testing Requirements/Design | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Where will the test cases to check functionality be defined? Here there are only CLI test definitions There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hi @Yarden-Z , yes the test cases mentioned here are for CLI which will be implemented in the sonic-utilities repo. Other than these, we plan on contributing test plans and test case code to the sonic-mgmt repo for functionality testing of this feature. |
||
|
||
#### Unit Test cases | ||
|
||
- Verify CLI to add DHCP rate on interface | ||
- Verify CLI to delete DHCP rate on interface | ||
- Verify CLI to display DHCP rates on all interfaces | ||
- Verify CLI to check valid DHCP rate (rate must be greater than 0 packets per second) | ||
- Verify CLI to check validity of port/portchannel on add and delete commands | ||
- Verify CLI to restrict one DHCP rate per interface | ||
*(previous rate must be removed before adding a new rate on an interface) | ||
- Verify CLI to ensure rate limit exists on interface before deleting | ||
|
||
|
||
### Warmboot and Fastboot Design Impact | ||
The existing warm boot/fast boot feature is not affected. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Future Work | ||
The scope of this HLD is limited to mitigating DHCP DoS attacks by rate-limiting the DHCP control packets. In the future, support for “DHCP Snooping” will also be provided to mitigate DHCP starvation attacks. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.